Republican Candidates

stdreb27

Active Member
Originally Posted by Tarball
So with that definition, what Bush did in Iraq was not Terrorism?
Terrorism is the act of terror. Look it up in the dictionary.
Bombs kill indiscriminately, no matter who set them off or who drops them.

Originally Posted by Tarball

You are a "LIAR"
Umm, no, I've reposted what you said, and it sure sounds like you are calling the commander and chief a terrorist to me. "using the definition".
I think it is far less of a jump to say "you call our troops terrorist" then bush invaded Iraq for oil.
 

stdreb27

Active Member
Originally Posted by 1journeyman
I just wish people would get in the habit of checking facts first...
But facts are simply pieces used to support your pre-supposed ideas. Surely you know that. You never use facts to contruct an opinion. Why that would be just soo republican of you.
 

stdreb27

Active Member
Originally Posted by ScubaDoo
Iraq expects to increase oil production, sees more speculation
2 days ago
DAVOS, Switzerland - Iraq plans to increase oil production this year and hopes to sign contracts to boost the output from oilfields that aren't producing to capacity, Iraq's oil minister says.
Iraq's oil production is at its highest since before the fall of Saddam Hussein in 2003, Hussein al-Shahristani said in an interview on the sidelines of the World Economic Forum's annual meeting.
"We have increased our production by 400,000 barrels a day over the last three months," he said. "In 2008, we expect another increase of similar size."
Iraq's Oil Ministry said Thursday that in January 2007, output was 1.9 million barrels per day. It soared to 2.4 million in November and inched up to 2.475 million daily barrels last month.
Dang and that is with a "civil war" going on in iraq. And harry ried saying we have lost in iraq. And clinton's suspention of disbelief to any good news.
 

scubadoo

Active Member
Originally Posted by 1journeyman
I just wish people would get in the habit of checking facts first...
Facts get in the way of conspiracy theory.
 

scubadoo

Active Member
Tarball said:
Originally Posted by 1journeyman
We can't steal the oil, all oil must be sold under & thru law. The oil belongs to the Iraq people. So therefor we can't "just take it". But, what we can do is dictate what price we buy it at & how its disrupted. That is why we are there! To secure the reserves for our best interests. The Iraq leaders must agree to our terms of Price to be bought & distribution. & they are not doing it.
That's why the oil isn't moving out of Iraq. The people of Iraq are refusing our demands of the oil.
You must visit the far left loonbird websites on a regular baisis. THat's where most of the conspiracy theories you beleive in come from.
Take a moment and step away from the loon message...and you might start understanding that the conspiracy advocates are not factually based in many cases.
There's a big world of info out there outside the far left loon sites and liberal biased PBS documentaries.
I do understand though some Bush haters use these sites to form their position.
 

tarball

Member

So that’s it “huh”
Is that how you are 1Journeman?
I have to accept my comment constantly dragged out of context.
Accept multiple derogatory comments made from many directions.
Accept comments leading into many directions to confuse my point.
Accept the hilariously nieve conspiracy theory remarks.
Accept my comments misused to try & make me look like I’m calling our
troops terrorist.
Accept dealing with argumentative & untrue comments.
Accept misleading & ridicules comments attacking the very beginning of what,
you people asked me to provide as proof of my thinking.
& Then after all “that” …accept my posts being removed. While what I have listed
above is allowed to exist and continue. What a pathetic bunch of knuckle dragging republicans exists in this thread.
I have come to the conclusion, there is no way I will ever be allowed to represent my opinion with the representation of insanity that exists in this republican topic.
Proving once again the republican Party should be dismantled & its members & followers. Shipped to Russia or China. Where a true Republic form of government exits.
This thread is a sad representation of our American people.
***********
 

stdreb27

Active Member
Originally Posted by Tarball
So with that definition, what Bush did in Iraq was not Terrorism?
I'm still not sure how I took this "out of context." Help this "closed minded idiot" understand?
 

scubadoo

Active Member
Originally Posted by stdreb27
I'm still not sure how I took this "out of context." Help this "closed minded idiot" understand?
When facts hit you in the face....there's not much left to do.
 

stdreb27

Active Member
so now that the riff raff is gone,
I was reading the hucksters paper that he had his famous quote "arrogant bush foreign policy" and the moron, basically outlined that exact same policy, then armchair quarterbacked some situations. Then said he would not be afraid to put troops in pakistan. It was kind of annoying, I don't understand this push to sound liberal in his campain.
 

scubadoo

Active Member
Originally Posted by stdreb27
Dang and that is with a "civil war" going on in iraq. And harry ried saying we have lost in iraq. And clinton's suspention of disbelief to any good news.
Yes, there is good news coming out of Iraq. You have to look for it but some reports are outh there.
We still have a very long way to go but it looks promising. Of course, this is now in direct contradicition to what was being hammered pre-surge.
I guess if it's good news coming form Iraq.....it must be lies to some folks
 

1journeyman

Active Member
Tarball, please reference any posts (use the post number located top right)where you were personally attacked and the posts will be edited or deleted. The only posts of yours that were deleted were one-liners insulting members on this forum.
I know I personally never use personal attacks.
 

scubadoo

Active Member
Originally Posted by 1journeyman
Tarball, please reference any posts (use the post number located top right)where you were personally attacked and the posts will be edited or deleted. The only posts of yours that were deleted were one-liners insulting members on this forum.
I know I personally never use personal attacks.
I think I called him a fake or fraud.
 

1journeyman

Active Member
Originally Posted by Tarball
...Accept my comments misused to try & make me look like I’m calling our
troops terrorist....
...Proving once again the republican Party should be dismantled & its members & followers. Shipped to Russia or China. Where a true Republic form of government exits....
Tarball, your posts were not taken out of context. Often times your entire posts were being quoted.
Tarball, when asked about terrorism you replied:
Originally Posted by tarball

So with that definition, what Bush did in Iraq was not Terrorism? Terrorism is the act of terror. Look it up in the dictionary. Bombs kill indiscriminately, no matter who set them off or who drops them
That is your entire post, nothing taken out of context. (post #1114)
You can certainly choose to no longer post here, but I want to make it clear to everyone who reads this the only threads of your's deleted were simple sentences attacking and name calling other members (as Mods we can still see deleted posts. If you wish I can pm you the posts I deleted).
You presented numerous ideas and theories, many found on conspiracy websites and blogs, and failed to respond in any meaningful way when presented with actual facts contradicting your posts.
The "war for oil" is the latest example. You made outragious claims that the US was somehow controlling the flow of oil out of Iraq. You even went so far as to say the Iraqi government was refusing to pump oil because they didn't want to sell it cheap to the US likewe were demanding. You refused to reply when I pointed out Iraq is a founding member of OPEC; or that Iraq had made major production deals with China and India.
Lastly, China and Russia neither one have "Republic" forms of Governments...
 

stdreb27

Active Member
Originally Posted by 1journeyman
Lastly, China and Russia neither one have "Republic" forms of Governments...
That isn't technically true, at least with russia.
 

stdreb27

Active Member
Originally Posted by ScubaDoo
I think I called him a fake or fraud.
i refered to his kind as skulls full of mush.
-the closeminded insane azzhole idiot-
 
Top