teresaq
Active Member
who dosent like Meatloaf and rocky horror.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yarYjuN-m8I
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yarYjuN-m8I
Rocky Horror
- Thread starter meowzer
- Start date
singing whatever happened to Saturday Night
meowzer
Moderator
Originally Posted by DragonZim
http:///forum/post/3236862
Probably Tim Curry's best role!
and he looked good in those fishnets too...
http:///forum/post/3236862
Probably Tim Curry's best role!
teresaq
Active Member
ok, I have to ask is this the same person. Listen to the voice.
This is my 10 yr old fav. movie-musical
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=inZ9AvxLohw
This is my 10 yr old fav. movie-musical
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=inZ9AvxLohw
meowzer
Moderator
Originally Posted by TeresaQ
http:///forum/post/3236872
ok, I have to ask is this the same person. Listen to the voice.
This is my 10 yr old fav. movie-musical
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=inZ9AvxLohw
I don't think that's Tim Curry
http:///forum/post/3236872
ok, I have to ask is this the same person. Listen to the voice.
This is my 10 yr old fav. movie-musical
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=inZ9AvxLohw
I don't think that's Tim Curry
bionicarm
Active Member
They played it every Friday night at the local theater where I went to college. We went a couple of times, but it's better going when you're totally smashed. The theater finally stopped showing it when someone snuck in a blow torch, and accidentally caught one of the curtains on fire.
uneverno
Active Member
Originally Posted by T316
http:///forum/post/3236823
+1, Never seen it in my life.
Saw a bunch of queers come into a mall about 15 yrs ago, acting out scenes or something, but that told me right there that I don't belong with this crowd...
uhhhmmm - srsly - "queers?" Ok. Nicely put. Thoroughly classy, not to mention well thought out and intelligent...
http:///forum/post/3236823
+1, Never seen it in my life.
Saw a bunch of queers come into a mall about 15 yrs ago, acting out scenes or something, but that told me right there that I don't belong with this crowd...
uhhhmmm - srsly - "queers?" Ok. Nicely put. Thoroughly classy, not to mention well thought out and intelligent...
uneverno
Active Member
Originally Posted by DragonZim
http:///forum/post/3236862
Probably Tim Curry's best role!
With the possible exception of his role as Cardinal Richelieu in "The Three Musketeers."
http:///forum/post/3236862
Probably Tim Curry's best role!
With the possible exception of his role as Cardinal Richelieu in "The Three Musketeers."
nigerbang
Active Member
Wasnt a movie I really cared to see (From the clips I have seen of it).
Someone brought up A Clockwork Orange.. I have seen that movie 100 times, I still dont understand what all the cult following is about that movie. I suppose it might have something to do with being the first X rated movie..Who knows..
Although, the scene where the priest is walking around and notices Alex smilling reading the bible, thinking of Jesus being whipped took some huge balls.. Even with the stuff that gets by, That is still one of the most risque scenes...
Someone brought up A Clockwork Orange.. I have seen that movie 100 times, I still dont understand what all the cult following is about that movie. I suppose it might have something to do with being the first X rated movie..Who knows..
Although, the scene where the priest is walking around and notices Alex smilling reading the bible, thinking of Jesus being whipped took some huge balls.. Even with the stuff that gets by, That is still one of the most risque scenes...
t316
Active Member
Originally Posted by uneverno
http:///forum/post/3240226
uhhhmmm - srsly - "queers?" Ok. Nicely put. Thoroughly classy, not to mention well thought out and intelligent...
What don't you understand?
Are you a queer and offended, or what?
I never said anything about being "classy". No, I'm a "right out there, tell it like I see it" kind of guy....
edit...
And if I have to think things out, then it's not "intelligent", just not me. Be yourself, or go home.
http:///forum/post/3240226
uhhhmmm - srsly - "queers?" Ok. Nicely put. Thoroughly classy, not to mention well thought out and intelligent...
What don't you understand?
I never said anything about being "classy". No, I'm a "right out there, tell it like I see it" kind of guy....
edit...
And if I have to think things out, then it's not "intelligent", just not me. Be yourself, or go home.
uneverno
Active Member
Originally Posted by T316
http:///forum/post/3240261
What don't you understand?
Are you a queer and offended, or what?
I never said anything about being "classy". No, I'm a "right out there, tell it like I see it" kind of guy....
edit...
And if I have to think things out, then it's not "intelligent", just not me. Be yourself, or go home.
uhuh. Thanks for the bigotry.
By all means - continue not thinking things out. It both benefits the species and lends credence to your world view.
http:///forum/post/3240261
What don't you understand?
I never said anything about being "classy". No, I'm a "right out there, tell it like I see it" kind of guy....
edit...
And if I have to think things out, then it's not "intelligent", just not me. Be yourself, or go home.
uhuh. Thanks for the bigotry.
By all means - continue not thinking things out. It both benefits the species and lends credence to your world view.
t316
Active Member
Originally Posted by uneverno
http:///forum/post/3240266
uhuh. Thanks for the bigotry.
By all means - continue not thinking things out. It benefits the species.
You avoided the question.
http:///forum/post/3240266
uhuh. Thanks for the bigotry.
By all means - continue not thinking things out. It benefits the species.
You avoided the question.
uneverno
Active Member
Originally Posted by T316
http:///forum/post/3240270
You avoided the question.
I'm sorry, there were multiple questions and both your syntax and logical application were poor. Let me attempt to address them specifically as I understand them:
Q:"What don't you understand?"
A:The necessity to be a bigot.
Q:"Are you a queer and offended, or what?"
A: I'm not sure how to answer that. Do I have to be both "queer" and offended? How do being "queer" and "offended" correlate? What if I'm just "queer?" What if I'm just offended? What if I'm neither? What if I'm both? How should I respond to "or what?" The possibilities are endless and, ultimately, the answers are meaningless because there is no logic train to the question.
How 'bout, instead of answering, I just ridicule your beliefs, predelictions and proclivities?
http:///forum/post/3240270
You avoided the question.
I'm sorry, there were multiple questions and both your syntax and logical application were poor. Let me attempt to address them specifically as I understand them:
Q:"What don't you understand?"
A:The necessity to be a bigot.
Q:"Are you a queer and offended, or what?"
A: I'm not sure how to answer that. Do I have to be both "queer" and offended? How do being "queer" and "offended" correlate? What if I'm just "queer?" What if I'm just offended? What if I'm neither? What if I'm both? How should I respond to "or what?" The possibilities are endless and, ultimately, the answers are meaningless because there is no logic train to the question.
How 'bout, instead of answering, I just ridicule your beliefs, predelictions and proclivities?
t316
Active Member
Originally Posted by uneverno
http:///forum/post/3240276
I'm sorry, there were multiple questions and both your syntax and logical application were poor. Let me attempt to address them specifically as I understand them:
Q:"What don't you understand?"
A:The necessity to be a bigot.
Q:"Are you a queer and offended, or what?"
A: I'm not sure how to answer that. Do I have to be both "queer" and "offended?" How do being "queer" and "offended" correlate? What if I'm just "queer?" What if I'm just "offended?" What if I'm neither? What if I'm both? How should I respond to "or what?" The possibilities are endless and, ultimately, meaningless because there is no logic train to the question.
Still avoided the question, so I'm assuming you are a queer.
For others, clarification would be ..."trouble relating to one specific sexual orientation (gay, heterosexual, homo, mix, etc). There is no "bigotry" related to the use of this term, only from those who are trying to avoid acceptance with one's personal inner-self.
From your comments, I would assume you are a queer uneverno, just as any male actors in this movie who wear fish net stockings....
http:///forum/post/3240276
I'm sorry, there were multiple questions and both your syntax and logical application were poor. Let me attempt to address them specifically as I understand them:
Q:"What don't you understand?"
A:The necessity to be a bigot.
Q:"Are you a queer and offended, or what?"
A: I'm not sure how to answer that. Do I have to be both "queer" and "offended?" How do being "queer" and "offended" correlate? What if I'm just "queer?" What if I'm just "offended?" What if I'm neither? What if I'm both? How should I respond to "or what?" The possibilities are endless and, ultimately, meaningless because there is no logic train to the question.
Still avoided the question, so I'm assuming you are a queer.
For others, clarification would be ..."trouble relating to one specific sexual orientation (gay, heterosexual, homo, mix, etc). There is no "bigotry" related to the use of this term, only from those who are trying to avoid acceptance with one's personal inner-self.
From your comments, I would assume you are a queer uneverno, just as any male actors in this movie who wear fish net stockings....
uneverno
Active Member
Originally Posted by T316
http:///forum/post/3240279
Still avoided the question, so I'm assuming you are a queer.
Non-sequitur. (Just in case you don't understand the term, lemme give you a leg up. It means that your two statements do not compose a logical argument because they are unrelatable.) Not only that, but which, of the multiple questions you posed did I avoid answering? - The one I answered, or the one which I explained at length was impossible to answer because your command of the language is so poor?
For others, clarification would be ..."trouble relating to one specific sexual orientation (gay, heterosexual, homo, mix, etc).
Huh? What does "for others" mean? Are you trying to justify your bigotry to the general readership on the forum? May as well try to justify calling me a N*****?
There is no "bigotry" related to the use of this term
Yes, there is. You're just willfully oblivious.
only from those who are trying to avoid acceptance with one's personal inner-self.
Fail to see how that has anything to do with anything but a lame attempt at self justification. My orientation, gender or race are not subject to your judgement. Not only that, but are you therefore saying that if I did accept my "personal inner-self," then you would accept me as a HOMO-sapien rather than whatever label you want to apply to me? Really? Perhaps you'd be more nomenclaturally comfortable with HETERO-sapien.
From your comments, I would assume you are a queer uneverno, just as any male actors in this movie who wear fish net stockings....
That's hilarious. As this is the internet, how do you know my race, gender or orientation? DumbASSumptions all, on your part...
http:///forum/post/3240279
Still avoided the question, so I'm assuming you are a queer.
Non-sequitur. (Just in case you don't understand the term, lemme give you a leg up. It means that your two statements do not compose a logical argument because they are unrelatable.) Not only that, but which, of the multiple questions you posed did I avoid answering? - The one I answered, or the one which I explained at length was impossible to answer because your command of the language is so poor?
For others, clarification would be ..."trouble relating to one specific sexual orientation (gay, heterosexual, homo, mix, etc).
Huh? What does "for others" mean? Are you trying to justify your bigotry to the general readership on the forum? May as well try to justify calling me a N*****?
There is no "bigotry" related to the use of this term
Yes, there is. You're just willfully oblivious.
only from those who are trying to avoid acceptance with one's personal inner-self.
Fail to see how that has anything to do with anything but a lame attempt at self justification. My orientation, gender or race are not subject to your judgement. Not only that, but are you therefore saying that if I did accept my "personal inner-self," then you would accept me as a HOMO-sapien rather than whatever label you want to apply to me? Really? Perhaps you'd be more nomenclaturally comfortable with HETERO-sapien.
From your comments, I would assume you are a queer uneverno, just as any male actors in this movie who wear fish net stockings....