Should the Federal Govt. Spend $1 Trillion Bailing Out US Financial Institutions?

nano reefer

Active Member
Originally Posted by lovethesea
http:///forum/post/2763259
yes we do......its called our kids and grandkids..

its called foriegn countries and our kids and grandkids. the money will all come from other countries, but our kids and grandkids will end up paying for the debt we will be in.
 

1journeyman

Active Member
Originally Posted by Rylan1
http:///forum/post/2765328
This is not over.... the next crisis will be the Alt A mortages... are economy is in bad shape... the reason why we are in this mess is because of deregulation and lack of oversight.
Can you imagine if Social Security was privatized into these institutions that some were calling for? Not only would your 401k be at risk... your social security would also be at risk.
I'm curious... how can is get to be a bigger mess then going bankrupt?
The "mess" we're in is based in very large measure to the Federal Government telling major lenders to make risky loans and that they would be insured...
Had the Feds not given this blank check to lenders fewer of these idiotic loans would have been made.
 

1journeyman

Active Member
Originally Posted by Rylan1
http:///forum/post/2765332
Gov't also just got a lot bigger... don't believe McCain... it is an absolute that some people will see more taxes... and that the Bush tax cuts won't remain the same as they currently are... regardless of who is president... there will be a tax increase.
Are you now saying Obama will raise taxes?
 

acrylics

Member
Originally Posted by Darthtang AW
http:///forum/post/2766083
No, the reason we are in this mess is people are stupid. Point blank. ... now they are crying.
I agree, stupidity on the part of the lenders and borrowers. But, banks are forced to do it to remain compliant with the Community Reinvestment Act.
Originally Posted by Nano Reefer

http:///forum/post/2766183
of course not! where are they going to get all this 1 trillion dollars? taxes, you say? they already spent all that! so we will borrow it from countries like CHINA, BRASIL, and MEXICO. and do you think we will ever pay off that 1 trillion? hell no! so just add another trillion to foreign debt and prolong our inevitable national bankruptcy.
Perhaps, but to be honest I see it as a possibly good investment over time, please see my first most in this thread. The Country will not be in the hole another trillion over this. That said, I don't like it either but it was necessary IMO.
If Reagan did'nt take down the orders of congress set forth by FDR that made banks behave in a certain way, we wouldn't have this problem. Put those plans back into action!
Please cite where Reagan did anything in this regard. The Gramm, Leach, & Bliley act was under Clinton in 1999, this act essentially repealed much of the Glass, Steagall Act, AKA the Banking Act of 1933. But to be fair the Congressional vote in '99 was so overwhelming as to be veto-proof.
The US is not absorbing all the debts, they are removing them from the market and "storing" them (while still receiving payments) until the housing market stabilizes. At that point they will become liquid again and can be resold back into the markets, probably at a higher price, thus making money from this.
As for the numbers, let's assume that a whopping 10% of all of them default tomorrow, that's $70 billion (10% of $700B.) Now lets assume the gov't has to sell all of that 50% short = net loss of $35B and the gov't can only sell the securities back to the market for what they paid. This is a worst case scenario. $35B equals $100 for every person in the country. If the gov't doesn't do this, it would cost everyone far more than this, far more. I still don't like it, it goes against everything I believe in but it serves everyone better than not doing it and keeps the economy from collapsing.
Philosophically speaking, I'd say let them all fold as well, we'll go into a depression that lasts a few years but we'll get out of it in time. Practically speaking though, this is not the world we live in. We need the world to have confidence in the dollar to some extent, else no trade, no imports, no exports, the world could pull it's bonds and we don't have the money to pay them. So we'd either have to default on them or print more currency which would be relatively worthless in such an event, and cause massive inflation. The other thing that could happen is a foreign entity buys the securities, then you have that foreign entity owning the paper on your home - not good. Again, philosophically speaking - I don't like it one bit, but does need to be done IMO.
 

oscardeuce

Active Member
Originally Posted by Rylan1
http:///forum/post/2765328
This is not over.... the next crisis will be the Alt A mortages... are economy is in bad shape... the reason why we are in this mess is because of deregulation and lack of oversight.
Can you imagine if Social Security was privatized into these institutions that some were calling for? Not only would your 401k be at risk... your social security would also be at risk.
You might want to check your deregulation commment. In the 90's the Clintons required many of these mortgages to be given to the people who could not afford them. I would argue, gov't intervention has an equal part to play as mismanagement. The former Fannie Mae leader is Obama's economic advisor. Now, that's change.
My social security is already at risk, in fact there is a pretty good chance I will never see the thousands of dollars I put into the system.
 

oscardeuce

Active Member
We went from the gold standard to the siver certificate to "paper". There is the true basis of our current problems. We do not have anything backing up our dollar.
 

stdreb27

Active Member
Originally Posted by oscardeuce
http:///forum/post/2766264
We went from the gold standard to the siver certificate to "paper". There is the true basis of our current problems. We do not have anything backing up our dollar.
The Bretton-woods agreement basically keeping us loosely tied to the gold standard collapsed because it was unsustainable. We can't go back to the gold standard. Because of the massive size of the world economy. The gold standard just doesn't work. The mechanics involved in pinning our currency to a gold or silver standard would make this bailout look like child's play.
What I think is even more scary is if they really do dump 1 trillion dollars into the money supply is what this is going to do for inflation. I don't know the time frame they are talking about. But if this is something immidiete like in a year. You're talking about printing money. And that will result in some serious inflation, double digit stuff.
 

stdreb27

Active Member
Originally Posted by acrylics
http:///forum/post/2766259
The US is not absorbing all the debts, they are removing them from the market and "storing" them (while still receiving payments) until the housing market stabilizes. At that point they will become liquid again and can be resold back into the markets, probably at a higher price, thus making money from this.
As for the numbers, let's assume that a whopping 10% of all of them default tomorrow, that's $70 billion (10% of $700B.) Now lets assume the gov't has to sell all of that 50% short = net loss of $35B and the gov't can only sell the securities back to the market for what they paid. This is a worst case scenario. $35B equals $100 for every person in the country. If the gov't doesn't do this, it would cost everyone far more than this, far more. I still don't like it, it goes against everything I believe in but it serves everyone better than not doing it and keeps the economy from collapsing.
I don't buy this, if there was a even decent chance at this being a money making endeavor, someone besides uncle Sam would have purchased it.
btw with the perception of a massive dump into the money supply did you see our currency fall again, and oil jump?
 

acrylics

Member
Originally Posted by stdreb27
http:///forum/post/2766307
I don't buy this, if there was a even decent chance at this being a money making endeavor, someone besides uncle Sam would have purchased it.
And who pray-tell has that sort of capital? Until the housing market stabilizes, there is no way to assess a true value, hence they are "toxic".
btw with the perception of a massive dump into the money supply did you see our currency fall again, and oil jump?
One could make several arguments regarding PMs and oil but my bet is that's it's a safe-haven move. No one is sure where to put dollars right now so commodities would be it, esp with the uncertainty. Yesterday's oil move was most likely short covering, notice how Nov's contract is back down to the 108 range, not 120-130. If it was a direct move back into oil, it would stay up there.
The money is being dumped in, no question, but that doesn't necessarily mean it's permanent. I know I know, I may be a dreamer, that's okay with me, but I read all I can and try to take emotion out of the equation.
And yes, I always watch the markets :)
And I should add, I could be wrong on this stuff, JMO
 

stdreb27

Active Member
Originally Posted by acrylics
http:///forum/post/2766326
And who pray-tell has that sort of capital? Until the housing market stabilizes, there is no way to assess a true value, hence they are "toxic".
One could make several arguments regarding PMs and oil but my bet is that's it's a safe-haven move. No one is sure where to put dollars right now so commodities would be it, esp with the uncertainty. Yesterday's oil move was most likely short covering, notice how Nov's contract is back down to the 108 range, not 120-130. If it was a direct move back into oil, it would stay up there.
The money is being dumped in, no question, but that doesn't necessarily mean it's permanent. I know I know, I may be a dreamer, that's okay with me, but I read all I can and try to take emotion out of the equation.
And yes, I always watch the markets :)
And I should add, I could be wrong on this stuff, JMO
If there is money to be made they will find the money to borrow. Not even china would touch this. (but I do think they have other things on their plate, like trying to keep their money pegged to ours. And spending that USD would blow their game.) There are alot of multi-gazillionaires out there, with $$ sitting there to make money.
If this much USD hits the money supply there is going to be a GLUTT of USD floating around. Dropping the value of the USD vs foreign currencies. Making oil that expensive again. (one of the reasons for the $140 a barrel price to begin with) Personally I don't think it is a move back into oil. Oil isn't stable, I think you're seeing people buy oil now, because if this hits the market, we are going to see oil driven up because of the change in the exchange rate. How high can that take it, I don't know. B/c the high wasn't driven solely by the exchange rate to begin with.
 

rylan1

Active Member
Originally Posted by 1journeyman
http:///forum/post/2766226
I'm curious... how can is get to be a bigger mess then going bankrupt?
The "mess" we're in is based in very large measure to the Federal Government telling major lenders to make risky loans and that they would be insured...
Had the Feds not given this blank check to lenders fewer of these idiotic loans would have been made.
because there are more bad loans out there in addtion to sub-primes... more banks are going to fail... what companies/banks did was assume too much risk... based on the mortage bubble... when it busted and economy tanked.... people either could no longer afford the loan.... or they couldn't afford it in the first place when the rates went up... or the banks encouraged false earning statements. We are in a recession... and if it continues... we are looking at a depression..
 

rylan1

Active Member
Originally Posted by stdreb27
http:///forum/post/2766335
If there is money to be made they will find the money to borrow. Not even china would touch this. (but I do think they have other things on their plate, like trying to keep their money pegged to ours. And spending that USD would blow their game.) There are alot of multi-gazillionaires out there, with $$ sitting there to make money.
If this much USD hits the money supply there is going to be a GLUTT of USD floating around. Dropping the value of the USD vs foreign currencies. Making oil that expensive again. (one of the reasons for the $140 a barrel price to begin with) Personally I don't think it is a move back into oil. Oil isn't stable, I think you're seeing people buy oil now, because if this hits the market, we are going to see oil driven up because of the change in the exchange rate. How high can that take it, I don't know. B/c the high wasn't driven solely by the exchange rate to begin with.
I don't think oil is the answer... has to be alternatives... I don't think oil will be stable for a long time.. and even if we drill off the coast... look at what could happen given Ike and a forecast for worst storms in the future.
If the Feds do this... I worry inflation will jump quite a bit... this may not be the best idea. Also... I think the bill includes other loans such as auto and credit cards.
 

rylan1

Active Member
Originally Posted by oscardeuce
http:///forum/post/2766261
You might want to check your deregulation commment. In the 90's the Clintons required many of these mortgages to be given to the people who could not afford them. I would argue, gov't intervention has an equal part to play as mismanagement. The former Fannie Mae leader is Obama's economic advisor. Now, that's change.
My social security is already at risk, in fact there is a pretty good chance I will never see the thousands of dollars I put into the system.
That is false... and been confirmed... Fannie Mae person is not an advisor or Obama... however, McCain has an advisor that lobbied for Fannie Mae.. and again... If social security was privatized... a lot of that money would be gone.
 

darthtang aw

Active Member
Originally Posted by Rylan1
http:///forum/post/2766439
That is false... and been confirmed... Fannie Mae person is not an advisor or Obama... however, McCain has an advisor that lobbied for Fannie Mae.. and again... If social security was privatized... a lot of that money would be gone.

So you are denying Franklin Raines had taken calls from Barack Obama's presidential campaign seeking his advice on

[hr]
and housing policy matters?
 

stdreb27

Active Member
Originally Posted by Rylan1
http:///forum/post/2766437
I don't think oil is the answer... has to be alternatives... I don't think oil will be stable for a long time.. and even if we drill off the coast... look at what could happen given Ike and a forecast for worst storms in the future.
If the Feds do this... I worry inflation will jump quite a bit... this may not be the best idea. Also... I think the bill includes other loans such as auto and credit cards.
Man just so you know, during Ike, a barrel of oil fell to 93ish dollars a barrel...

however you are correct, since it is traded as a commodity, it will never be stable.
 

lovethesea

Active Member
well, as usual they are all "skeptical" and no one wants to act on this. They knew this was all going on and let it happen and now, they won't commit to fix it. Who ISN"T skeptical??? Typical.........
 

rylan1

Active Member
Originally Posted by Darthtang AW
http:///forum/post/2766483
So you are denying Franklin Raines had taken calls from Barack Obama's presidential campaign seeking his advice on

[hr]
and housing policy matters?

He is not an Obama advisor nor has he ever been... and trying to link Obama to Fannie Mae and the housing meltdown is simply another lie attempting to mislead people. Also keep in mind this guy is the CEO of Fannie Mae... and asking him questions in relation to trying to understand a problem seems logical to me.
What was McCain's position prior to this in all the years when this was being implemented... he would have had an input to the deregulation that put all this in motion.... Right?
Well he was for more deregulation... and has only changed his opinion in the last week or two. He is not Johm McCain ... He is now John Populist and will tell you what you want to hear.
 

rylan1

Active Member
Originally Posted by stdreb27
http:///forum/post/2766490
Man just so you know, during Ike, a barrel of oil fell to 93ish dollars a barrel...

however you are correct, since it is traded as a commodity, it will never be stable.
Why?
Oil production in the Gulf has stopped.... Refineries shut down.... Oil rigs in Gulf were destroyed...not all but some...
Shortages based on human consumption and storing..
So whats up with that?
 

1journeyman

Active Member
Originally Posted by Rylan1
http:///forum/post/2766430
because there are more bad loans out there in addtion to sub-primes... more banks are going to fail... what companies/banks did was assume too much risk... based on the mortage bubble... when it busted and economy tanked.... people either could no longer afford the loan.... or they couldn't afford it in the first place when the rates went up... or the banks encouraged false earning statements. We are in a recession... and if it continues... we are looking at a depression..
Numerous portions of this post are incorrect...
Freddy and Fanny are not banks.
The Prime Lending Rate has not gone up significantly.
We are not in a Recession. In additition to the over 3% growth we had last quarter, the average income of families rose by over $700 in 2007....
 
Top