Originally Posted by
Jmick
Well, according to your fellow Christians there wasn't talk everywhere and it was an underground movement (would be curious how that assumption was made). Perhaps the Idol that was Jesus/figure head of Christianity was much more powerful then the man who may have lived and embellishing stories/tales was a benefit?
So has the burden of proof in this discussion...when it comes to historical evidence I don't think it's me. Hearsay is hearsay and until you have something of substance your points are rather mute. Answer these four questions.
Why are there no writings of Jesus that date to the TIME HE LIVED?
Why no sculptures, drawings or paintings?
Why did it take so long after his death to write the gospels and why in Greek, instead of either Latin or Hebrew?
Finally, why are Christians so desperate to find physical evidence of Jesus...the Shroud of Turin, the Burial Box of James and the Fictional Letters of Pontius Pilate?
The entire NT was written within 60 years of the death of Jesus. You keep saying you want "contempory" writings.... From a historical scolastic approach this is contemporay.
I already mentioned; The significant first century churches and crosses are a form of evidence.
I'm not at all interested in finding physical proof. Nor are anyone I know...