Originally Posted by
myzislow
http:///forum/post/2682153
Candycane, it's quite obvious you're the self proclaimed clam guru around here; we all get the point that you know your stuff when it comes to clams. But, to say that a crocea clam cannot survive longterm, under a T5 setup, is a generalized blanket statement that really holds no truth at all.
I'm not trying to start and argument and nor do I really care to; all I'm going to say on the subject is that maybe YOU should do some more research before you doubt the capabilities of a properly designed T5 set up.
Never saw someone that didn't care, care enough to make a post.
Sorry, I had to get something to eat.
Oh here ya go, then i'm gonna finish my meatball sub. Anyone ever type so quick their computer starts beeping at them? LOL
With T5s, 10K bulbs with the highest reflection qualities possible are about as close as it comes to replicating the "energy" towards PAR that clams may need. Granted it is partially based off of NM that is coming from each spectrum.
You can do this if you want to, I already know. Grab two clams, both with the same coloration patterns and see which one has more densely populated (or "overpopulated" in one of the cases) Zooxanthellae in it's mantle after a few months; the one under halides or T5s. When Zooxanthellae are not feeding off of light because they are not getting enough, they turn to nitrogen. Guess what they are competing with for the nitrogen and ammonium.....The clam maybe. You think I just blurt this stuff out without researching it for quite some time?
As for the two Croceas above, the one to the left still looks partially ok. The one on the right is stretching its mantle A LOT.
Here ya go. Here's a Crocea that I have had for quite some time now. You can almost say I pretty much raised the thing. PITCH!!! If anyone wants to buy the thing I am trying to sell it.