While we are at it, let's close all our Eurpean military bases.

darthtang aw

Active Member
Originally Posted by Fishtaco
http:///forum/post/3142572
You know what, if I was a CEO or a business owner and had to take a 10 percent pay loss to save a good employee I would do it willingly. Do you have any idea the vast amounts of money these people make and still are unwilling to do anything to help those that help make them so wealthy. I guess my ethics and morals just don't work the same as most peoples. My wifes company took a loss just like most and they had a pay freeze and that went all the way up the corporate ladder and there have been no job losses even though the bottom line is down about 30 percent. This is a major software firm with thousands of people BTW. Luckily I am in the position of making money for myself when I need to and don't have to rely on the scraps thrown me by a CEO making millions of dollars a year to burn a company to the ground. My view on capitalism is the old fashioned one taught to me by a small business owner that employed me for 14 years and treated me very well and in return every single day I did the best job for him I could possibly do. We had some slow times, but they where just that and we always recovered by using that time to build inventory and would come out on top when the market again picked up because we could do same day delivery on stuff that would take competing companies weeks or months to produce. He passed away and his "new style" capitalist son took over, suddenly raises where at the threat of quitting only and my yearly bonus was cut in third so he could buy his wife a new chest, drive a new BMW and buy a second home worth a million. Needless to say I left that job as fast as I could and when I drove by that business recently it looks closed up tight after 50 years in business under the old owner.
Fishtaco.
You didn't answer the question. I didn't think so...
Starbucks CEO to a pay cut this last year and hasn't acceppted a raise since 2004. He makes 1 million a year. Starbucks top executives have all had their wages frozen as well....
Chrysler's CEO took a drastic pay cut.
GM CEO took a huge pay cut and cut executive salaries as well.
Lehman brothers CEO and executive employees lost their jobs.
Same with EDS
California's education system....The politicians and Government adminstration refused to cut their salaries and thus caused huge layoffs in the education system of teachers and aids.....
I hate to tell you...all ceo's aren't greedy. Of those listed, only the Government officials and ran program cut employees at the price of maintaining the "rich" status quo.
It is funny to me....right now at HD they have a wage freeze...no one has been laid off but they did close a few "experiment" stores that just weren't turning a profit. Many of those employees were worked into the "normal" stores..but some did get laid off from the "experiment" stores.
I hear people at work complaining about the wage freeze, and how it is unfair...yet 90% of the employees there are NOT hard workers. I work part time---anyone in the store will tell you I get more done in four hours than any two full time employees do in 16. Even with a wage freeze in place....I got one.....
Another example...I know of someone in the store that might get laid off. There position was changed...so thus they had to rebid on it...some of the duties changed. They heard about this change coming 3 months in advance. Instead of still performing their current job to their best ability they got mad at the job duty change (which incidentally adds up to be less work) and started half assing their job and hold a piss poor attitude. Now is bid time for the position....normally this person would be a shoe in....but due to their attitude and work ethic lately they no longer are...and from what I hear are out the door......Is this the ceo's fault as well?
You can't place it all at the feet of the ceo. When business got slow....the company I worked for would lay off the worst workers first...those that have bad attitudes, poor work ethic, and overall a drain on the company. I have never been laid off during these times.....and never have worried about...because I make myself stick out and seen as an asset.
You blame ceo's and their greed, but in my experience the first layoffs are always the dead weight.....now come a second and third layoff....Then I would start to look at the ceos.
 

jackri

Active Member
I personally like how Unions strike for more benefits as their company is going bankrupt and can't already afford them.
If the companies are greedy and don't know how to stay open -- LET THEM CLOSE AND STOP BAILING THEM OUT. The market will eventually right itself but yes, it hurts short time. Right now there is no penalty for bending people over -- some even get rewarded *cough AIG cough*
 

fishtaco

Active Member
I was also talking about 2nd and 3rd lay-offs as well, cutting dead weight by getting rid of bad employees is perfectly acceptable and not what I had in mind. What I think about a few of these companies you listed is easy though.
Starbuck's expanded way too fast and lost their elite coffee status and it hurt their bottom line, coffee snobs don't like to pay that much for coffee unless they feel "special". Those small Starbuck's at places like Safeway where a stupid idea.
The corporate guys at GM and Chrysler deserved the lack of pay after running those companies into the ground and not being flexible enough to respond to the needs of the buyer.
Lehman Brothers........another fine example of expertly deployed golden parachutes and I am sure those poor people might have been forced to sell their third home in Mexico because of the tight times.
I don't understand though how I did not answer your question, but I can tell you I don't care how much money a person makes, what kind of car they drive or how nice of business suit they wear, if the circumstances where different and you take away the advantage of wealth and education from these people a lot of them would be nothing but street level criminals and hustlers. Honesty has nothing to do with social class.
Fishtaco
 

darthtang aw

Active Member
Originally Posted by Fishtaco
http:///forum/post/3142626
I don't understand though how I did not answer your question, but I can tell you I don't care how much money a person makes, what kind of car they drive or how nice of business suit they wear, if the circumstances where different and you take away the advantage of wealth and education from these people a lot of them would be nothing but street level criminals and hustlers. Honesty has nothing to do with social class.
Fishtaco
I asked if YOU (as you are now) would be willing to take a 10% wage cut and a pay freeze if it would save the job of the janitor? Not if you would take one if you were rich....
 

fishtaco

Active Member
If it was a 10 percent drop in wages across the board for everyone including the CEO and the company was not showing a profit, then yes I probably would if it was a job I enjoyed. Sorry but I had the struggle between being rich or being happy about 6 years ago and having a good life easily won out over slaving away and having more money. I live a good and simple life and it is enough for me and I could care less what other people think when I (gasps in horror) drive a 37 year old vehicle and don't live in a McMansion or spend 30 dollars on a haircut.
Fishtaco
 

darthtang aw

Active Member
Originally Posted by Fishtaco
http:///forum/post/3142636
If it was a 10 percent drop in wages across the board for everyone including the CEO and the company was not showing a profit, then yes I probably would if it was a job I enjoyed. Sorry but I had the struggle between being rich or being happy about 6 years ago and having a good life easily won out over slaving away and having more money. I live a good and simple life and it is enough for me and I could care less what other people think when I (gasps in horror) drive a 37 year old vehicle and don't live in a McMansion or spend 30 dollars on a haircut.
Fishtaco
so you would take a pay cut to save a job only if everyone is doing it.....That in itself is a form greed, as your money and current lifestyle is more important to you over anothers. Keeping what is yours at the detriment to others is greed....
 

fishtaco

Active Member
Originally Posted by Darthtang AW
http:///forum/post/3142644
so you would take a pay cut to save a job only if everyone is doing it.....That in itself is a form greed, as your money and current lifestyle is more important to you over anothers. Keeping what is yours at the detriment to others is greed....
If you think I am a greedy person, then you are going to have to make up a new word for people who are actually greedy. I get what you are leading up to in the regards that is what I would expect a CEO to do and yes if I was the CEO of a company in trouble, pride alone and hatred of failure would make it easy to give up 10 percent of my check to save a good employee even if it is the person who cleans up, I would consider it an investment. Besides when you make a few million or a lot of millions a year, what is 10% percent in the big picture?
Fishtaco
 

jackri

Active Member
I guess 10% on a million dollars is 100,000. That's alot more than 20 employees making 50k getting cut 10% at 5K each instead.
If you worked your tail off making and building a business and to be "fair" had to lose 100,000K a year while no one else did --- yeah sounds real fair to the top guy now doesn't it? (just like the top 10% pay something like 85% of the taxes or more) Or -- you could just have somone making 50k a year making all the top decisions.
I'm not saying all situations are like this -- they're not. They are all unique and can be argued everywhich way back and forth. Corruption makes the hard working high payed person look back because they get lumped in with greed. Lazy pieces of doo doo workers make the unemployed look bad although they may have been the hardest workers in the companies. There is always an instance where the opposite seems true.
 

fishtaco

Active Member
Losing some money, but saving your business in the long term and being patient and growing a company is a price that most don't want to pay if there is a quick million to be made. That aside, what really gets me wondering is after you make more money than you can spend in your lifetime why are you still going to work everyday anyway and bothering to make more or feel the need to break the rules to increase profit for yourself at the cost of the company.
Fishtaco
 

darthtang aw

Active Member
Originally Posted by Fishtaco
http:///forum/post/3142677
That aside, what really gets me wondering is after you make more money than you can spend in your lifetime why are you still going to work everyday anyway and bothering to make more or feel the need to break the rules to increase profit for yourself at the cost of the company.
Fishtaco
To ensure future generations have a better life....at one time this was what America was viewed for.
 

fishtaco

Active Member
Originally Posted by Darthtang AW
http:///forum/post/3143091
To ensure future generations have a better life....at one time this was what America was viewed for.
Don't kid yourself, it is about power, greed and corruption. The criminals at places like AIG came within a whisker of breaking the country. How in the world do you think "family money" makes this country great? What makes this country great are the people that start with nothing and through HONEST hard work make something of themselves. I don't have kids, but when the time comes to make out a will I won't just be leaving my estate to any of them just because they are my closest family.
Fishtaco
 

darthtang aw

Active Member
Originally Posted by Fishtaco
http:///forum/post/3143109
Don't kid yourself, it is about power, greed and corruption. The criminals at places like AIG came within a whisker of breaking the country. How in the world do you think "family money" makes this country great? What makes this country great are the people that start with nothing and through HONEST hard work make something of themselves. I don't have kids, but when the time comes to make out a will I won't just be leaving my estate to any of them just because they are my closest family.
Fishtaco

But if you had 5 million dollars and could work a few more years and turn that into 10 million, you wouldn't, so future family members can have the things you had?
And how was AIG able to do this....oh yeah....through our esteemed politicians and the regulations or refusal to regulate. Such as Barney Frank....
 

fishtaco

Active Member
Originally Posted by Darthtang AW
http:///forum/post/3143122
But if you had 5 million dollars and could work a few more years and turn that into 10 million, you wouldn't, so future family members can have the things you had?
And how was AIG able to do this....oh yeah....through our esteemed politicians and the regulations or refusal to regulate. Such as Barney Frank....
The only thing I would provide for a child of mine after they turned adult would be the option of going to college, which is more than I got, but I am sure that AIG and the rest of the crooks who took TARP money where just doing it for the "children".
Just remember, all these people who took the TARP money provided for their future generation of 1% percenters with OUR tax dollars, reminds me more of the great houses of Europe more than anything else.
I am well aware of what Barney Frank did and as far as I am concerned, as I have said before I am all for term limits to get rid of as many of these people as possible. Sorry but I don't see a lot of party lines, just a bunch of criminals and I am sure there is a whole list of GOP people who got some pretty sweet deals on their

[hr]
loans, I think the going rate if you are in congress is 3.0% percent from the companies we bailed out.
Your obviously leaning towards the conservative side, but just remember more than likely every person you vote for is just telling you what you want to here about taxes, family values, global warming and once they get to Washington they sell their vote to the highest bidder. Bah! I hate it.
Fishtaco
 

darthtang aw

Active Member
Originally Posted by Fishtaco
http:///forum/post/3143133
Your obviously leaning towards the conservative side, but just remember more than likely every person you vote for is just telling you what you want to here about taxes, family values, global warming and once they get to Washington they sell their vote to the highest bidder. Bah! I hate it.
Fishtaco

Which is why I believe we should not have a "party" system...we should have an individual system. No Ds or Rs on the ballot, you remove that aspect and people will be less likely to vote for a possible crook just because he is democrat or republican. You did that and term limits wouldn't matter.....as the campaigns would be ran on individual performance instead of "I am not a republican, just look at what republicans are doing"...I think the good ones actually get ousted when there is a party switch because the country decides to go democrat one election and republican the next....Of course if we did that, then people actually might have to pay more attention or research and that takes away their TMZ/Perez

[hr]
time.
 

fishtaco

Active Member
Yep, we lost a good moderate Republican in congress last year simply because he had a (R) in front of his name, it did however save him the embarassment of being forced from office by his own party for not towing the far-right conservative line. Heaven help a canidate these days if he is a fiscal conservative with moderate social views.
Fishtaco
 
Top