kjr_trig
Active Member
Originally Posted by crypt keeper
http:///forum/post/3184714
Bowl games only mean you won 7 games during the season. That doest make you a better conference. Any team can beat another team in college ball. USC always loses to some sorry school in its own conference. It was Stanford then Washington. Then Oregon State. If that is your measure for success in that conference please start over. The SEC had two schools 12-0 entering last week. Top to bottom as a whole the SEC blows away any conference. They have a ton of schools and each week they battle. If USC had to play in that conference every year they would be like Arkansas or Ole Miss good every once in a while but far from domination. Your Conference has had zero parity for the most part. USC wins em all but 1 and does or doesnt play for a National Championship depending if the better conferences beat each other up. How is that a good conference?
Take a guess how many times USC has lost out of conference since 2003? How about once, thats 31-1!!!!!!! and that is not playing cream puffs, Pete is undefeated against the SEC, his only ever loss out of conference took the greatest single performance ever by Vince Young. Yet in that time frame USC has lost to every team in the Pac 10 except WSU. USC dominates out of conference yet always loses in conference. RR is right, your logic is way twisted.
The Pac 10 having the best record in bowl games doesn't mean anything...Did you read that before you typed it?? USC has future NFL players all over the place on their team this year, yet they are 6th in the PAC!!
Let me repeat, Pete Carroll has never lost to an SEC team. Yet you magically think they would get dominated with all their NFL talent (that would be 12 players drafted last year alone)....Please