Originally Posted by
stdreb27
http:///forum/post/3145689
The point would be, they are supporting it in an effart to get votes from the Hispanic population...
Except that the question was leading and appears to have been asked of my district's demographics. I was just trying to set the record straight:
The majority here is white (generally English/Scottish) and the largest Minorities are Asian (Viet-Namese, Chinese and Korean.) The Hispanics living here are generally legal. Income level is among the highest in the nation and therefore so are housing prices, making the district, for the most part, too expensive for illegals to live in.
As a general statement, it may have been fair to make, except that the article didn't list the other 29 signatories to the letter so a potentially faulty generalization appears to have been drawn based on the 1 representative who was featured.
Additionally, the article specifies that the main goal of the letter is to allow legal immigrants who have been here less than 5 years access to a public option, should that actually occur, because they are currently barred from doing so even though they'd pay for it.
Lastly, one does have to consider the source. The (DC) Times is a conservative publication, and so biases its reporting accordingly, just like liberal publications do.