Evolution vs. Intelligent Design

bionicarm

Active Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flower http:///t/392782/evolution-vs-intelligent-design/680#post_3495906
The Torah has been very closely guarded over the centuries, and if a single letter in the Torah gets flaked off, then that scroll is rendered useless. It must be read and examined in it's entirety, by several Rabbis to make sure that was the only spot where a problem is found, and then repaired. The Torah scrolls are not mass produced like the Bible, it's hand rendered and copied exactly as the book before it. It is never interpreted, just meticulously copied. Before the copy is accepted, it is scrutinized by several Rabbis to be declared Kosher. If a mistake is made while writing the Torah, and that section contains the name of God, it is not repaired, but discarded and buried with dignity.
So to answer your question.....Yes I'm trusting the Torah is correct indeed. That Torah is what all the other writings use as a base to make sure theirs is correct.
Concerning the Muslims, they follow the Quran, and the Quran states that it is not a stand alone book but MUST be used with the books already written. So while the Quran is pure and written just as Mohamed quoted, the Islam religion is screwed up in how they follow it. Because the Muslims don't trust translations and don't want to study Hebrew, they don't study anything but the Quran and they trust that one because they can read it in their own language. Also if they disagree openly concerning the religion Islam, they are put to death.Their country is not like this one where freedom of religion is a right. I have talked with several Muslims and they secretly disagree with the religion Islam, but believe the Quran the way it was meant to be. Most Muslims are very sweet people who do their best to be kind and considerate.
The Christian Bible, while it has many translations is still pretty close to the Torah on scripture. That's why the "OLD testament" matches the Jewish Torah. Most Christians don't realize that the letters and the Gospels are not scripture...However those letters and eyewitness accounts have been carefully copied in their original form. Translations are taken from the reading of the original documents. Then you have folks who really didn't understand the Jewish people who wrote those accounts, and created a separate religion, that is based on the religion that Emperor Constantine had mingled with pagan customs....Which is also why Muslim and Jews don't trust anything Christian.
Therefore if you want to know what those original documents actually say, then you can study and read it yourself. The books are correct but the people who follow them are human and subject to human error. We do our best, we can't do better than that.
But here you stand. You make no effort to learn what the books even say, because you don't believe, which is fine. However then you have the audacity to criticize those who are trying to translate the books so the common people can read them and learn. Then claim that's the reason you don't believe, which isn't the truth. The truth is you don't believe and never based that belief on anything you ever read.
Maybe you were burned out by a religion...many people just can't stomach a certain religion, and actually seem to think that if that religion is off they all must be. I call that...tossing out the baby with the bath water.
For those who were burned by religion...If they ever again hunger for God....learn to eat the meat and throw away the bones.
But that's the crux of it all. It's nothing but words in a book. Whoever and however you interpret it for your own self worth and faith is fine by me. However, you have these religious fanatics who "live by the Book, and die by the Book", simply because someone told them the words that were translated were true to form, and everything written has to be believeable. Why? Because some ancient Torah scrolls says it happened? Aesop wrote many well known fables in his time. But I don't go around believing every one of those. He lived and wrote those somewhere between 620 and 560 BC. Sounds prettty old to me. So what's the difference between his writings, and these writing of the Torah?
 

flower

Well-Known Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by bionicarm http:///t/392782/evolution-vs-intelligent-design/680#post_3495929
But that's the crux of it all. It's nothing but words in a book. Whoever and however you interpret it for your own self worth and faith is fine by me. However, you have these religious fanatics who "live by the Book, and die by the Book", simply because someone told them the words that were translated were true to form, and everything written has to be believeable. Why? Because some ancient Torah scrolls says it happened? Aesop wrote many well known fables in his time. But I don't go around believing every one of those. He lived and wrote those somewhere between 620 and 560 BC. Sounds prettty old to me. So what's the difference between his writings, and these writing of the Torah?
The fact that it's called Aesop's FAIRY-TAILS, should be a clue.
Our history is written down in books, I believe them too. Our school text books are also believed. Books can contain fiction and non-fiction, even very old books. When a book says it's an account of true happenings and were eye witnessed and written down, they are books that can be considered non-fiction...a fairytale or one of our novels we read for a pass time are fictional.
I am a religious fanatic, I live and die by the books...I build my entire life around them. I am not a loon who bombs innocent people or killing myself doing so, or kills the doctor performing an abortion, or goes to a grave site and pickets the funeral of a gay guy. Crazies come in all shapes and forms. It isn't the books fault that certain people are nuts.
 

darthtang aw

Active Member
It has nothing to do with discrediting a book.  You say you're making your own interpretation by learning Hebrew and "figuring it out yourself".  Do you have proof that the Hebrew version you're translating is the first and actual "original"?  Who knows what's been "lost in translation" over a couple of centuries.  Again, I base my beliefs on facts, not what some book says MAY have happened where there's no viable physical proof that it did.  What's funny is how you have all these different religious groups/orders that base their beliefs and strong convictions on how THEY interpret the book.  You can't even get several of them to agree what many of the passages mean.  So they twist the words to suit there specific religious agendas, then convince their followers that their versioin is the "true word of the gospel".  I just don't get how someone can put so much faith in a book.  If you ask a Scientologist, L. Ron Hubbard's little diddy trumps the Bible.  Are the Mormons wrong in their interpretation that God actually lives near the planet Kolob?  Why do Muslims believe their book is more important than yours?  Which one is the "right one"?
All Biblical scholars and other historians agree. The bible was first written in Hebrew with a few chapters written in Aramaic. There is no debating that. The Original Hebrew Language was made up of 22 Consanants only. No Vowels. Vowels came along later in the language.
The New Testament was originally written in Greek.
So, if a person had the desire to learn the languages they could translate the wordings themselves without fear of false interpretation from others.
If you are going to use "translation" issues as a possibility that something might not be true, then you may as well Ignore all of history except recent history written in English. Because who knows....The egyptian empire may never have occurred. After all, it is written about in the Bible...and we wouldn't want to believe that.
 

bionicarm

Active Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darthtang AW http:///t/392782/evolution-vs-intelligent-design/700#post_3495938
All Biblical scholars and other historians agree. The bible was first written in Hebrew with a few chapters written in Aramaic. There is no debating that. The Original Hebrew Language was made up of 22 Consanants only. No Vowels. Vowels came along later in the language.
The New Testament was originally written in Greek.
So, if a person had the desire to learn the languages they could translate the wordings themselves without fear of false interpretation from others.
If you are going to use "translation" issues as a possibility that something might not be true, then you may as well Ignore all of history except recent history written in English. Because who knows....The egyptian empire may never have occurred. After all, it is written about in the Bible...and we wouldn't want to believe that.
Ah, but there are physical artifacts that prove the Egyptian Empire existed. We have pyramids and sarcophagus with mummies who are dated to live in the timeframes depicted in the history books of that era. Same with the Roman Empire. Historians have found some physical evidence that ties certain events stated in the Bible (some of the Apostle's graves). But I haven't seen evidence that there was an Ark, the Garden of Eden existed, that there was a physical tablet of the Ten Commandments that Moses brought down from the mountain. So is it your summation that since some of the events listed in the Bible could be physically verified, that every single event stated in that book must also be true?
 

bionicarm

Active Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flower http:///t/392782/evolution-vs-intelligent-design/700#post_3495932
The fact that it's called Aesop's FAIRY-TAILS, should be a clue.
Our history is written down in books, I believe them too. Our school text books are also believed. Books can contain fiction and non-fiction, even very old books. When a book says it's an account of true happenings and were eye witnessed and written down, they are books that can be considered non-fiction...a fairytale or one of our novels we read for a pass time are fictional.
I am a religious fanatic, I live and die by the books...I build my entire life around them. I am not a loon who bombs innocent people or killing myself doing so, or kills the doctor performing an abortion, or goes to a grave site and pickets the funeral of a gay guy. Crazies come in all shapes and forms. It isn't the books fault that certain people are nuts.
I'm not trying to insult the faithful like yourself. It's the individuals in your latter examples that I have an issue with. What people do in the confines of their own home, or within the walls of their house of worship is none of my business. That's between them and their own faith. It's when someone wants to push their religious agendas into my life is where I draw the line. If your religious beliefs thinks that abortion, gay marriage, drinking alcohol, or having unwedded sex or morally wrong, you have a right to those opinions. But just because you believe in them doesn't mean that every single person on this planet has to have the same beliefs.
 

bionicarm

Active Member
Seems this neurosurgeon believes he has prrof that Heaven exists. Sounded more like a weird acid trip to me. The brain plays funny tricks, even though he said what he experienced was physically impossible in the state his cerebral cortex was in. I guess my questions would be - If you know this wonderous place exists, why are you still here (or does committing suicide negate the experioence)? If you found Heaven, why were you allowed to come back (he never mentions why or.how he was able to return to his human form)?
http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2012/10/07/proof-of-heaven-a-doctor-s-experience-with-the-afterlife.html
 

flower

Well-Known Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by bionicarm http:///t/392782/evolution-vs-intelligent-design/700#post_3495952
I'm not trying to insult the faithful like yourself. It's the individuals in your latter examples that I have an issue with. What people do in the confines of their own home, or within the walls of their house of worship is none of my business. That's between them and their own faith. It's when someone wants to push their religious agendas into my life is where I draw the line. If your religious beliefs thinks that abortion, gay marriage, drinking alcohol, or having unwedded sex or morally wrong, you have a right to those opinions. But just because you believe in them doesn't mean that every single person on this planet has to have the same beliefs.
On that last point my friend, I can totally agree with you 100%...Thankfully, I am only responsible for my own actions, so that's the only person I try to control about how to conduct themselves thru life. For everyone else, including my children and grandchildren, I live by example, and try very hard to have an answer for any questions if they should ask.
I do want to comment a little on the life after death thing, and your response. I was slipping into death when I had my heart attack (age 22). When the doctor injected me with something that snapped me to life (I heard the doctor say cardiac arrest just before that moment) I was a little angry at being so rudely awakened. I was in pain just before and then I suddenly was very comfortable, and slipping into sleep. Since that time, I lost my fear of death, but I do enjoy living. I'm sure the fellow you were talking about feels the same way.
Oh, and I do recall Jesus telling a story...and then saying, "even if one were to return from the dead, still they would not believe" Maybe HaShem allowed the fellow to return to at least try and convince folks like yourself...God does stuff like that, caring even for those who don't believe he is even there...and trying to warn them anyway.
 

pezenfuego

Active Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flower http:///t/392782/evolution-vs-intelligent-design/700#post_3495962
On that last point my friend, I can totally agree with you 100%...Thankfully, I am only responsible for my own actions, so that's the only person I try to control about how to conduct themselves thru life. For everyone else, including my children and grandchildren, I live by example, and try very hard to have an answer for any questions if they should ask.
I do want to comment a little on the life after death thing, and your response. I was slipping into death when I had my heart attack (age 22). When the doctor injected me with something that snapped me to life (I heard the doctor say cardiac arrest just before that moment) I was a little angry at being so rudely awakened. I was in pain just before and then I suddenly was very comfortable, and slipping into sleep. Since that time, I lost my fear of death, but I do enjoy living. I'm sure the fellow you were talking about feels the same way.
Oh, and I do recall Jesus telling a story...and then saying, "even if one were to return from the dead, still they would not believe" Maybe HaShem allowed the fellow to return to at least try and convince folks like yourself...God does stuff like that, caring even for those who don't believe he is even there...and trying to warn them anyway.
"God does stuff like that, caring even for those who don't believe he is even there...and trying to warn them anyway."
This really bothers me. Why does he have to try? Try implies that he does not always succeed. I'm not nitpicking, I just don't follow this at all.
 

flower

Well-Known Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by PEZenfuego http:///t/392782/evolution-vs-intelligent-design/700#post_3495963
"God does stuff like that, caring even for those who don't believe he is even there...and trying to warn them anyway."
This really bothers me. Why does he have to try? Try implies that he does not always succeed. I'm not nitpicking, I just don't follow this at all.
A major obstacle called free choice. If God wanted to really make you pay attention, he could, such as Pharaoh in the days of Moses...LOL...believe me, you don't want God to prove himself.
Most times in scripture, he sends somebody to speak to the unbelievers and "sinners" to give them a chance to repent. Abraham was told if he could find 10 righteous people he would spare the entire city. The two Angels he sent found only Lot. Jonah was sent to warn the people and they repented, God spared them all.
 

pezenfuego

Active Member
Nature: God created people the way they are-He is the reason they do not believe in Him.
Nurture: God created the environment and foresaw the experiences the person would have-It is His fault that they do not believe in Him.
Satan's intervention: God created the devil and must have known what would follow. It is His fault that they do not believe in Him.
 

flower

Well-Known Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by PEZenfuego http:///t/392782/evolution-vs-intelligent-design/700#post_3495973
Nature: God created people the way they are-He is the reason they do not believe in Him.
Nurture: God created the environment and foresaw the experiences the person would have-It is His fault that they do not believe in Him.
Satan's intervention: God created the devil and must have known what would follow. It is His fault that they do not believe in Him.
Pez...You are correct on all points. The Satan (adversary) his only purpose is to put the faithful to the test. the teacher wants us to pass the test.
God did indeed create us, and knew our outcome from the very start. We each play our part. The thing is...WE
don't know our outcome. Are we the adversary, who only has the purpose to test the faithful, and in the end be discarded after serving the purpose for which it was created?
or
Are we the faithful, and how much can we do with what he gave us. Will we pass the test by the skin of our teeth, or flying colors like Moses? When we are tested, are we pure gold?
What can the pot say to the potter, we are in his hands to do with as he pleases. He is God, the All Mighty. We are nothing before him, why does he care for such a worm. Why bother with tests, the reason why, is not answered for us. We have free will, and ultimately that will was directed by his hand. My life is in his hands...He knows that, most importantly, I know that. So few of us tiny humans, with our tiny minds really understand that. The way to life is narrow, and few there be that find it.
So...Where will your free will take you? What role will you play in the fabric of life? You are what you are, will that spur you to seek him out, or cause you to scorn the very idea that you really don't have a choice? What will you do? The action a person takes defines the role they play.
You see, it isn't Gods FAULT...He had a plan from the get go.
 

pezenfuego

Active Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flower http:///t/392782/evolution-vs-intelligent-design/700#post_3495994
Pez...You are correct on all points. The Satan (adversary) his only purpose is to put the faithful to the test. the teacher wants us to pass the test.
God did indeed create us, and knew our outcome from the very start. We each play our part. The thing is...WE
don't know our outcome. Are we the adversary, who only has the purpose to test the faithful, and in the end be discarded after serving the purpose for which it was created?
or
Are we the faithful, and how much can we do with what he gave us. Will we pass the test by the skin of our teeth, or flying colors like Moses? When we are tested, are we pure gold?
What can the pot say to the potter, we are in his hands to do with as he pleases. He is God, the All Mighty. We are nothing before him, why does he care for such a worm. Why bother with tests, the reason why, is not answered for us. We have free will, and ultimately that will was directed by his hand. My life is in his hands...He knows that, most importantly, I know that. So few of us tiny humans, with our tiny minds really understand that. The way to life is narrow, and few there be that find it.
So...Where will your free will take you? What role will you play in the fabric of life? You are what you are, will that spur you to seek him out, or cause you to scorn the very idea that you really don't have a choice? What will you do? The action a person takes defines the role they play.
You see, it isn't Gods FAULT...He had a plan from the get go.
I want you to know that fault was not the word I wanted to use, but no other word I could think of would get my point across. For that I am sorry.
 

2quills

Well-Known Member
Flower, do you think of God as a male? If the notion that God is everywhere and unseen. How can you be sure? And what ever happened to the sacred feminine in all of this,...don't the ladies get props too? It takes 2 to create new life here on earth. So did he do it all alone? I'm not trying to antagonize. Just wondering.
 

flower

Well-Known Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Quills http:///t/392782/evolution-vs-intelligent-design/700#post_3495997
Flower, do you think of God as a male? If the notion that God is everywhere and unseen. How can you be sure? And what ever happened to the sacred feminine in all of this,...don't the ladies get props too? It takes 2 to create new life here on earth. So did he do it all alone? I'm not trying to antagonize. Just wondering.
LOL...actually if you got into the Jewish mystery...called Kabbalah You would have a better understanding of the Jewish thought on God. Do a web search and look up the Kabbalah tree of life.
"
The God head is really neither male or female, He is the image of creation. I'm not sure you want an answer as deep as this one can get. The word "HE is used more of a position than a sex. A man is the father, the head of the household. Just as the word firstborn "SON" means the inheritor of all. Since God is the creator, our "Father" the concept of calling God a HE, came into focus. Things are explained in a way a person can understand, such as the position of a father in a home, and the firstborn son.
This is just a tiny paragraph. I don't know much more, I barely scratched the surface on this subject. The books called the Zohar contain the information in detail.
The Jewish thought on God: HaShem is Ayn Soph, the beginning of all things.
Kabbalists believe the Tree of Life to be a diagrammatic representation of the process by which the Universe came into being. On the Tree of Life, the beginning of the Universe is placed at a space above the first sephira
, named Keter ("crown" in English). It is not always pictured in reproductions of the Tree of Life, but is referred to universally as Ain Soph Aur (Ain - Without, Soph - End, Aur - Light). To kabbalists, it symbolizes that point beyond which our comprehension of the origins of Being cannot go; it is considered to be an infinite nothingness out of which the first 'thing' (thought of in science and the Kabbalah to be energy) exploded to create a Universe of multiple things.
A picture of the tree of life.... Basically, Kabbalists and scientists are similar in thought on creation. However scientists error when it is said things just happened.... HaShem has a design and a purpose, an intelligence. Life was not just something that accidently happened. This diagram is also referred to as the God head. So for many Christians looking at this post.... this is the first time they are seeing what Paul in the Bible was talking about. The God head is not what Christians think it is.
 

darthtang aw

Active Member
Haven't you seen Dogma? God is a female.
God is supposed to be perfect. He is clearly not female. If god was female she would spend more time applying her own make up, fixing her hair, trying on push up bras. Etc etc. there would have been no time for creation.
Besides. When is the last time a woman impregnated another women?
Darth (chauvinist) Tang
 

pezenfuego

Active Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darthtang AW http:///t/392782/evolution-vs-intelligent-design/700#post_3496018
God is supposed to be perfect. He is clearly not female. If god was female she would spend more time applying her own make up, fixing her hair, trying on push up bras. Etc etc. there would have been no time for creation.
Besides. When is the last time a woman impregnated another women?
Darth (chauvinist) Tang
Are you questioning the movie "Dogma?" Next you're going to tell me that George Carlin wasn't a Catholic priest.
 
Top