reefraff
Active Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheClemsonKid http:///forum/thread/386190/good-news-ohio-soon-we-ll-be-able-to-have-our-guns-in-our-bars/100#post_3391249
Alright, I'm going to take your words exactly, and replace "gun", with "car".
Let's apply a tactic seldom used by the anti car crowd, Common Sense. Here you have a class of people who pay the fees and take the classes to allow themselves to LEGALLY drive a car. Why would someone go to all that trouble to comply with the law and then purposefully violate the provision that you not drive your car, ANYWHERE, while you are consuming alcohol? Sure, you'll have a fractional percentage of permit holders who are goobers and will drive the car while they are drinking but overall you'd have better luck finding a needle in a haystack than finding a permit holder driving a car drinking. .
Really? Because in 2008, there were 37,261 deaths in traffic accidents in the United States. Of those, 13,846 were alcohol related. So the "needle in the haystack" you speak of is 37%. So you really think that if 37% of those deaths were caused by people who got in a car drunk, that these same law abiding citizens would follow suits with their guns?
I'm just using the numbers here involving alcohol and another situation where people spend a lot of money and time to get a permit, and still let alcohol trump their time and money... It's not apples to apples, but it's pretty darn close in my opinion...
Is it against the rules to have a couple beers then drive? No. Most of the people who get caught driving drunk don't think they are even impaired. They didn't set out to drive drunk. In the case of the permit holder it is against the law to carry while you are drinking period, not just in a bar but anywhere. You would have to have a person set out to break the law right out the gates to have them drinking with the gun in their possession.
Originally Posted by TheClemsonKid http:///forum/thread/386190/good-news-ohio-soon-we-ll-be-able-to-have-our-guns-in-our-bars/100#post_3391249
Alright, I'm going to take your words exactly, and replace "gun", with "car".
Let's apply a tactic seldom used by the anti car crowd, Common Sense. Here you have a class of people who pay the fees and take the classes to allow themselves to LEGALLY drive a car. Why would someone go to all that trouble to comply with the law and then purposefully violate the provision that you not drive your car, ANYWHERE, while you are consuming alcohol? Sure, you'll have a fractional percentage of permit holders who are goobers and will drive the car while they are drinking but overall you'd have better luck finding a needle in a haystack than finding a permit holder driving a car drinking. .
Really? Because in 2008, there were 37,261 deaths in traffic accidents in the United States. Of those, 13,846 were alcohol related. So the "needle in the haystack" you speak of is 37%. So you really think that if 37% of those deaths were caused by people who got in a car drunk, that these same law abiding citizens would follow suits with their guns?
I'm just using the numbers here involving alcohol and another situation where people spend a lot of money and time to get a permit, and still let alcohol trump their time and money... It's not apples to apples, but it's pretty darn close in my opinion...
Is it against the rules to have a couple beers then drive? No. Most of the people who get caught driving drunk don't think they are even impaired. They didn't set out to drive drunk. In the case of the permit holder it is against the law to carry while you are drinking period, not just in a bar but anywhere. You would have to have a person set out to break the law right out the gates to have them drinking with the gun in their possession.