stanlalee
Active Member
I think some of you are giving fish too much credit for the ability to be emotionally pleasured by their surroundings. The reef is not a safe, friendly relaxed place for most of the fish we keep. Its no nemo movie but a constant struggle to eat and not be eaten. who knows if they are happy, living in hell or indifferent. Not like anybody can ask them and for most species behavior is inconclusive given the "proper captive" conditions for that species. I really think wether they are "happy" or not has no place in this sort of discussion or is a reasonable argument for ethics of keeping them in captivity. You cant include a variable you have no way to quantify. Arguments about life span, effects on the reefs, collection and transport practices are valid (even though you probably cant source any real data because it likely doesn't exist). like I said earlier most sources consider the "ornament" fish trade virtually insignificant. Hardly any research goes into ornamental fish (no more than what it takes to keep those that can be kept and the occasional marine biologist who fancies it) because no one feels its a significantly large enough market to warrant the expense of researching them. they can easily collect them, they are always there to be collected despite the amount collected = little effort or motivation to research them like they do commercial fish species.