darthtang aw
Active Member
Here's a nice comparative. When it comes to who gets higher amounts of private donations, Obama only gets 14% of contributions over $2,500, while Romney gets 48% of the same type if donations. Appears Obama gets the majority of his funding from his various SuperPAC's, those anonymous businesses whose employees contribute to a candidate that they normally wouldn't provide a donations to if they had to give them their personal funds. What's the most depressing is both candidates have amassed over $1.3 BILLION since this article was reported. Here people are complaining about wasteful government spending, and this year's Presidential election has thrown away probably more than $3 billion if you add all the money the other 7 or 8 Republican candidates spent this last year on their futile and failed attempts to win the Republican nomination.
http://elections.nytimes.com/2012/campaign-finance
3 billion, donated for the purpose of running for office. This isn't government spending. This is money donated to campaigns to get people elected. Government has nothing to do with it. It isn't tax revenue, it is money voluntarily given.
I have no issue with this. If some schmuck wants to donate 2 million to a campaign it is their money. It is no different than a schmuck donating 2 million to have a mosque or temple built. It is their money given of thier own free will. And it is directed back into the economy.
http://elections.nytimes.com/2012/campaign-finance
3 billion, donated for the purpose of running for office. This isn't government spending. This is money donated to campaigns to get people elected. Government has nothing to do with it. It isn't tax revenue, it is money voluntarily given.
I have no issue with this. If some schmuck wants to donate 2 million to a campaign it is their money. It is no different than a schmuck donating 2 million to have a mosque or temple built. It is their money given of thier own free will. And it is directed back into the economy.