well, although not proven 100%, if he is not involved with terrorsm and the WTC crash of 9-11
then there is an awful lot fo circumstancial evidence. like him not only being in the right place for the alleged meetings, but also in the same country strikes a pretty impressive suspicion. for a man who never left iraq much at the time, he was in the right places at the right times, to be able to convince me.
But like i said YES, it is only circumstancial. But that would be like saying i just happend to be standing at the JFk carrying a box cutter onto a plane that fatal morning. BUT I HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH IT.
Who do you suppose would believe me?
And, IMO having anything to do with 911 as well as everythign else he had done, is more than justifiable reasoning for us getting involved. HECK, it should have been done before but we backed down and left iraq prematurely the first time.
Not to mention, he harbored terrorist and encouraged his sons to be the way they are. And, if they were not terrorist and dictators, then i would not have a clue as to whom to refer to as a terrorist.
And dont be dissing uncle adolf, he was a key role in history and although a driven man, we owe alot of our freedoms to him and the war. Without hitler and the war, many things we take for granted accept as freedom, would not be today.