Republican Candidates

1journeyman

1journeyman

Active Member
Originally Posted by Jerthunter
I really do not want to get into this but when I see someone accuse a person or an organization of being racist I feel they should be ready to back up their claim.....
Fair enough;
First off, while not racist, I have an issue with a presedential candidate going to a church which states "We are an African people, and remain "true to our native land"... Great. Move back then. Where do Obama's allegiances lie? America or Africa?
Secondly, if you go back and read past sermons the pastor clearly is preaching political sermons... the legality of that is certainly in question.
Third, can you imagine the outrage if a Republican candidate went to a church that espoused it's allegiance to Europe and White principles? Or how about;
*Commitment to the White Community
*Commitment to the White Family
*Adherence to the White Work Ethic
*Pledge allegiance to all White leadership who espouse and embrace the White Value System
*Personal commitment to embracement of the White Value System.
Would that not strike you as a racist group? Hopefully it certainly would.
 
stdreb27

stdreb27

Active Member
Originally Posted by 1journeyman
Fair enough;
First off, while not racist, I have an issue with a presedential candidate going to a church which states "We are an African people, and remain "true to our native land"... Great. Move back then. Where do Obama's allegiances lie? America or Africa?
Secondly, if you go back and read past sermons the pastor clearly is preaching political sermons... the legality of that is certainly in question.
Third, can you imagine the outrage if a Republican candidate went to a church that espoused it's allegiance to Europe and White principles? Or how about;
*Commitment to the White Community
*Commitment to the White Family
*Adherence to the White Work Ethic
*Pledge allegiance to all White leadership who espouse and embrace the White Value System
*Personal commitment to embracement of the White Value System.
Would that not strike you as a racist group? Hopefully it certainly would.
Hei Hitler
 
rylan1

rylan1

Active Member
Originally Posted by 1journeyman
Fair enough;
First off, while not racist, I have an issue with a presedential candidate going to a church which states "We are an African people, and remain "true to our native land"... Great. Move back then. Where do Obama's allegiances lie? America or Africa?
Secondly, if you go back and read past sermons the pastor clearly is preaching political sermons... the legality of that is certainly in question.
Third, can you imagine the outrage if a Republican candidate went to a church that espoused it's allegiance to Europe and White principles? Or how about;
*Commitment to the White Community
*Commitment to the White Family
*Adherence to the White Work Ethic
*Pledge allegiance to all White leadership who espouse and embrace the White Value System
*Personal commitment to embracement of the White Value System.
Would that not strike you as a racist group? Hopefully it certainly would.
This just shows how clueless you all are when it comes to african americans. The church seems to IMO is trying to restore the african cultural roots that were taken away during slavery. We all know that much of history is skewed to give europeans a greater influence in world history, and that blacks lack the cultural connection that other groups of people have. Yes we know we are from Africa, but Africa is a continent made up of all different types of people. I don't understand why anything african is thought of as being bad. Someone can say they are proud of their greek, italian, or whatever heritage.. and its okay. A Commitment to your family and to your community is a good thing. It shows that you want to uplift your community and be accountable for it.
I think you should move past this topic.
 
stdreb27

stdreb27

Active Member
Originally Posted by Rylan1
This just shows how clueless you all are when it comes to african americans.
It is a two way street.
 
1journeyman

1journeyman

Active Member
Originally Posted by Rylan1
This just shows how clueless you all are when it comes to african americans.
No.
It shows how I consider all men equal, regardless of skin color. And it shows how I understand anyone can be a racist, regardless of skin color.
Racism is racism....
 
stdreb27

stdreb27

Active Member
Originally Posted by J.P
i didnt really read any of this but anyways
GO RON PAUL!!!!!
Ron Paul is a nut.
 
rylan1

rylan1

Active Member
Originally Posted by J.P
i didnt really read any of this but anyways
GO RON PAUL!!!!!
& his KKK support
 
rylan1

rylan1

Active Member
Originally Posted by 1journeyman
No.
It shows how I consider all men equal, regardless of skin color. And it shows how I understand anyone can be a racist, regardless of skin color.
Racism is racism....
Its not racists... just because you are unable to identify with it does not mean it is racist.
The Founding Father's considered all men equal too... yet many of them had slaves... because blacks were not men... give me a break and move on. Nothing about the church is racist. It from my account teaches african americans about who we are, where we are from, and how to restore our cultural identity in a biblical view.
 
burch2006

burch2006

Member
sundays before noon are the most segregated hours of our country... And even if you make a flat tax you wouldnt eliminate accountants (which I am). You still deal with money wouldnt you? Accounting is so much more than just taxes.
 
rylan1

rylan1

Active Member
Originally Posted by burch2006
sundays before noon are the most segregated hours of our country... And even if you make a flat tax you wouldnt eliminate accountants (which I am). You still deal with money wouldnt you? Accounting is so much more than just taxes.
Thank you sir for moving back,
Yes I think you would still provide accounting services such as budgeting and book(s) management. But I think that the need for accountants would decrease sharply because there would be less work for you to do. Not to mention tax attorneys and others who rely on the tax system. I wonder what would happen to all the people who currently owe back taxes and that sort of thing? What about non-profit asso?
 
salty blues

salty blues

Active Member
Originally Posted by 1journeyman
And I'll ask you a third time; Who pays for the deficit this plan would create?
We the people.
 
stdreb27

stdreb27

Active Member
You know speaking of the KKK, I was watching a braves baseball game this summer with a friend who never watches and knows nothing about baseball. Anyway after the first inning whoever it was had struck out the side. So the tv coverage went to the guy in the stadium hanging the K signs. So there were the kkk for the 3 strikeouts. Anyway, after showing those guys about 4 more times laughing it up and having now 3 kkk signs. He couldn't handle it anymore and asked why in the world were these kluckers in the stands at a braves game and on and on and on.
 
rylan1

rylan1

Active Member
Originally Posted by 1journeyman
And I'll ask you a third time; Who pays for the deficit this plan would create?

Oh, I missed that. The plan would cost $50-$65 billion. In comparison that less than 110 billion that it would cost for Clinton's. which if you want to compare. The cost of the war per month is $9 billion per month without taking into account all the other costs.
 
rylan1

rylan1

Active Member
Originally Posted by J.P
wuts that mean?

Ron Paul recieved campaign contributions from the KKK.
 
rylan1

rylan1

Active Member
Originally Posted by J.P
soo is that a bad thing?

Depends on who you ask.
My advise would be to respectfully say thank you and give it back.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top