Should the Federal Govt. Spend $1 Trillion Bailing Out US Financial Institutions?

darthtang aw

Active Member
Originally Posted by reefraff
http:///forum/post/2769798
WHere did you hear that? I can't believe they would allow taxpayer dollars to go to that corrupt group


Google Bailout and Earmarks, you will get a quite a few blogs and stories, still looking for something more concrete, but that may take a couple days.
 

stdreb27

Active Member
Originally Posted by Darthtang AW
http:///forum/post/2769801
Google Bailout and Earmarks, you will get a quite a few blogs and stories, still looking for something more concrete, but that may take a couple days.
If I remember right, they have to release the bill by posting it on the net, before the prez signs it, so we'll find out.
 

oscardeuce

Active Member
Politics make for strange bed fellows. The Democrats seem to be siding with Bush on the bail out's while the Republicans seem to be hesitant to support this Federalization of a major part of our economy.
What happened to "Bush is wrong, no 3rd term for Bush( McCain)"?
 

stdreb27

Active Member
Originally Posted by oscardeuce
http:///forum/post/2769833
Politics make for strange bed fellows. The Democrats seem to be siding with Bush on the bail out's while the Republicans seem to be hesitant to support this Federalization of a major part of our economy.
What happened to "Bush is wrong, no 3rd term for Bush( McCain)"?
And why is he letting a democrat write the bill? And if this was good, why don't the dems just pass the thing, they have majorities, they don't need the republicans to pass it. Just from the vibes I'm getting from the politics I'd walk.
 

1knight164

Member
Originally Posted by reefraff
http:///forum/post/2769798
WHere did you hear that? I can't believe they would allow taxpayer dollars to go to that corrupt group

Saw it on FOX this morning. Went to search info, but came up with a lot of blogs. I was hoping someone knew more about it because it's pretty ridiculous. You all seem to know where to find all the good info.

This is the best I could find:
http://publicmarkup.org/bill/dodds-l...tment-aut/1/5/
It's from Dodds counter-proposal to Paulson. Twenty percent profits was suppose to go to the Housing Trust Fund and Capital Management Fund. Some translated that to mean ACORN and La Raza?
 

1knight164

Member
Unless someone has anything different, looks like the provisions for directing funds to ACORN and La Raza are still in the proposal and Republicans are having a hard time getting it cut from the proposal.
 

stdreb27

Active Member
I've decided, I'm not in on the deal. Let them fail, let the market correct itself. And spin off fanny and freddy, into about 10 different companies, like they did with the bell company. It will correct itself on its own.
 

bionicarm

Active Member
Originally Posted by stdreb27
http:///forum/post/2771138
I've decided, I'm not in on the deal. Let them fail, let the market correct itself. And spin off fanny and freddy, into about 10 different companies, like they did with the bell company. It will correct itself on its own.
Sure it'll eventually correct itself. But not before it gets more than half of my 401K. If you're under 30, it won't matter to you. It's us old gas passers who'll be the one's that'll get burned.
 

darthtang aw

Active Member
Originally Posted by bionicarm
http:///forum/post/2771169
Sure it'll eventually correct itself. But not before it gets more than half of my 401K. If you're under 30, it won't matter to you. It's us old gas passers who'll be the one's that'll get burned.


Not if you move your money around, my father in law already moved his money and hasn't lost anything.
401k is a stock market which is gambling, there are no guarantees....It is a global casino so to speak...do you ask the government for money you lost at the casino?
 

jmick

Active Member
Originally Posted by stdreb27
http:///forum/post/2771138
I've decided, I'm not in on the deal. Let them fail, let the market correct itself. And spin off fanny and freddy, into about 10 different companies, like they did with the bell company. It will correct itself on its own.
Based on numerous other posts you've made heralding the free market approach I'd be surprised if you wanted to go with the government bailout of the financial institutions.
 

bionicarm

Active Member
Originally Posted by Darthtang AW
http:///forum/post/2771194
Not if you move your money around, my father in law already moved his money and hasn't lost anything.
401k is a stock market which is gambling, there are no guarantees....It is a global casino so to speak...do you ask the government for money you lost at the casino?
Please. You obviously don't have a clue how to manage a 401K account, or what it even entails. Do you know what FIXED FUNDS are? Unless you move everything you have into them, you are losing something right now. There's not a market or fund out there that's making much, if anything at all. And if the market and banks crash, Fixed Funds won't be worth anything.
 

darthtang aw

Active Member
Originally Posted by bionicarm
http:///forum/post/2771324
Please. You obviously don't have a clue how to manage a 401K account, or what it even entails. Do you know what FIXED FUNDS are? Unless you move everything you have into them, you are losing something right now. There's not a market or fund out there that's making much, if anything at all. And if the market and banks crash, Fixed Funds won't be worth anything.

So you are telling me you can't move them?
 

stdreb27

Active Member
Originally Posted by Jmick
http:///forum/post/2771225
Based on numerous other posts you've made heralding the free market approach I'd be surprised if you wanted to go with the government bailout of the financial institutions.
There is a degree of involvement the government needs to have. For instance mandating a single currency. (back in the day each state had their own currency) Also stuff like the FDIC to help add faith to our fiat based monetary system. If there is no faith there is no system. The governments job is to ensure faith in the monetary system. And I was undecided to see if maybe there is a need to help facilitate faith in the system. But due to a number of reasons, one being people still believe in the system, if the system is there. If there is a bank people will go borrow money. I don't think that on a whole the believe in the monetary system will dissapear like it did during the great depression.
second, I'm all for a government making a buck without dipping into my wallet. And if they can turn around in a few months and sell the stuff, then it might not be all bad. Especially when they lower taxes or pay off debt in the process. (not that they would)
Third, I may still change my mind, there is no bill on the table to be for or against at this point. But the longer congress plays with the thing, the more of the $$ goes into their "friends" back pockets and greasing the wheels of politics. Instead of what it was intended to in the first place.
 

reefraff

Active Member
Originally Posted by Darthtang AW
http:///forum/post/2771327
So you are telling me you can't move them?
I haven't lost one red cent on my 401K or IRA's. I They are there for retirement and I don't plan on selling them until I do something unusual, like retire

I am already retired but 18 years away from being able to draw on the stuff. Ten years out we will be adjusting the allocation of our investments to more bonds and cash holdings. Every 401K we have ever had allows you to move balances among funds. About 18 months ago we did move around 50K in the wife's 401K into a money market fund. We missed the top but not by much. Just waiting for the bottom now.
 

bionicarm

Active Member
Originally Posted by reefraff
http:///forum/post/2772067
I haven't lost one red cent on my 401K or IRA's. I They are there for retirement and I don't plan on selling them until I do something unusual, like retire

I am already retired but 18 years away from being able to draw on the stuff. Ten years out we will be adjusting the allocation of our investments to more bonds and cash holdings. Every 401K we have ever had allows you to move balances among funds. About 18 months ago we did move around 50K in the wife's 401K into a money market fund. We missed the top but not by much. Just waiting for the bottom now.
Come on. You're saying that your current 401K is perfectly balanced, and you've lost absolutely NOTHING regarding your bottom line? I find that very hard to believe. There's not a fund in any 401K plan that is positive right now. Most funds are losing anywhere between 6% - 21%. There are probably only two or three investment firms that deal with companies to provide employees 401K compensation plans. The most popular being Fidelity. If you use Fidelity like I do, then we have the opportunity to move our investments into the same funds. If you know which plans are making money, PLEASE tell me the names of the funds. I want to get into them. Like I said, unless you have your money 100% in Fixed Mutal Funds, I guarantee you've lost some money in your 401K. As far as IRA's, they are backed by the FDIC, and because of the limited amount you can put into them, of course you won't lose money in them. However, you make far less in interest by sticking all your money into IRA's. That's the point of investing in plans like the 401K. It gives you the opportunity to invest your hard-earned money into various markets PRE-TAX that in turns allows you to make more money for your retirement future. Right now, playing the less aggressive funds, the "safe funds" will ensure the value of your 401K doesn't lose a drammatic amount of money. However, in the long run you have far less money in your 401K fund when you do plan to retire, which is the whole reason for investing in a 401K in the first place.
The goal of investing is to earn enough money so that when you do retire, you have the funds to live the same lifestyle that you currently live while you're working. So if you currently make $40K a year after taxes, and you want to maintain that same income after you quit working (whether it's at 58 or 65), you have to have enough money in your investment account to be able to pay you that $40K until you die. So for the above scenario, if you retired at the normal age of 65, and you were fortunate enough to live until you were 80, you'd need at least $600K in your 401K to maintain that theoretical $40K/year lifestyle. However, that doesn't take into account inflation and the increase of the cost of living. So you'd probably need closer to $800,000 in your account to sustain what you consider is $40K/year in today's money. Yes, you're still earning interest on your money after you retire, but you normally dump your funds into 'fixed assets' that make very small percentages. So if the cost of living is higher that the interest you're earning, you'll need more money in your account. If you play it 'safe' in your 401K all the time, you'll never be able to reach that goal.
So Darth makes some moronic statement that investing in 401K's is like gambling, and you deserve to lose your money if you stick it in there. So please tell me oh wise one, where else do you invest your money so that you can have that golden nest egg for your retirement future? Oh I know! THE REAL ESTATE MARKET!!
 

stdreb27

Active Member
Originally Posted by bionicarm
http:///forum/post/2772104
Come on. You're saying that your current 401K is perfectly balanced, and you've lost absolutely NOTHING regarding your bottom line? I find that very hard to believe. There's not a fund in any 401K plan that is positive right now. Most funds are losing anywhere between 6% - 21%. There are probably only two or three investment firms that deal with companies to provide employees 401K compensation plans. The most popular being Fidelity. If you use Fidelity like I do, then we have the opportunity to move our investments into the same funds. If you know which plans are making money, PLEASE tell me the names of the funds. I want to get into them. Like I said, unless you have your money 100% in Fixed Mutal Funds, I guarantee you've lost some money in your 401K. As far as IRA's, they are backed by the FDIC, and because of the limited amount you can put into them, of course you won't lose money in them. However, you make far less in interest by sticking all your money into IRA's. That's the point of investing in plans like the 401K. It gives you the opportunity to invest your hard-earned money into various markets PRE-TAX that in turns allows you to make more money for your retirement future. Right now, playing the less aggressive funds, the "safe funds" will ensure the value of your 401K doesn't lose a drammatic amount of money. However, in the long run you have far less money in your 401K fund when you do plan to retire, which is the whole reason for investing in a 401K in the first place.
The goal of investing is to earn enough money so that when you do retire, you have the funds to live the same lifestyle that you currently live while you're working. So if you currently make $40K a year after taxes, and you want to maintain that same income after you quit working (whether it's at 58 or 65), you have to have enough money in your investment account to be able to pay you that $40K until you die. So for the above scenario, if you retired at the normal age of 65, and you were fortunate enough to live until you were 80, you'd need at least $600K in your 401K to maintain that theoretical $40K/year lifestyle. However, that doesn't take into account inflation and the increase of the cost of living. So you'd probably need closer to $800,000 in your account to sustain what you consider is $40K/year in today's money. Yes, you're still earning interest on your money after you retire, but you normally dump your funds into 'fixed assets' that make very small percentages. So if the cost of living is higher that the interest you're earning, you'll need more money in your account. If you play it 'safe' in your 401K all the time, you'll never be able to reach that goal.
So Darth makes some moronic statement that investing in 401K's is like gambling, and you deserve to lose your money if you stick it in there. So please tell me oh wise one, where else do you invest your money so that you can have that golden nest egg for your retirement future? Oh I know! THE REAL ESTATE MARKET!!

I'm up like 6% for the year. But I moved most of it to bonds, and currency.
 

bionicarm

Active Member
Originally Posted by stdreb27
http:///forum/post/2772196
I'm up like 6% for the year. But I moved most of it to bonds, and currency.
That's what I call Fixed Funds. Very safe, but don't make much. However, the way the maket has tanked, 6% is better than the -13% I'm at right now. I've moved mine over to the same type of investments. Hopefully I can recover to maybe -8% by the end of the year.
 

darthtang aw

Active Member
Originally Posted by bionicarm
http:///forum/post/2772343
That's what I call Fixed Funds. Very safe, but don't make much. However, the way the maket has tanked, 6% is better than the -13% I'm at right now. I've moved mine over to the same type of investments. Hopefully I can recover to maybe -8% by the end of the year.
I see, so you could have moved your funds.....thanks for clearing that up. And you called me the moron? Pay attention. If you pay everything off before you retire, IE home, cars, CC, and other loans, and kids grown and moved on, you don't need that 40K that you needed your whole life to live the same lifestyle, 20-25K will do just fine and you could invest in the "safe" funds with the lower interest rate but still maintain the same lifestyle after retirement. But no...everyone (like you) wants their cake and eat it to.....You want the huge gain and huge payoff without the risk involved....
Are you down 13% for the year or since the beginning? If it is just for the year you are not out as much in the grand scheme of things....as the previous years I bet you made a good percentage...so why the complaint? One bad year and your retirement is ruined?
 

bionicarm

Active Member
Originally Posted by Darthtang AW
http:///forum/post/2773464
I see, so you could have moved your funds.....thanks for clearing that up. And you called me the moron? Pay attention. If you pay everything off before you retire, IE home, cars, CC, and other loans, and kids grown and moved on, you don't need that 40K that you needed your whole life to live the same lifestyle, 20-25K will do just fine and you could invest in the "safe" funds with the lower interest rate but still maintain the same lifestyle after retirement. But no...everyone (like you) wants their cake and eat it to.....You want the huge gain and huge payoff without the risk involved....
Are you down 13% for the year or since the beginning? If it is just for the year you are not out as much in the grand scheme of things....as the previous years I bet you made a good percentage...so why the complaint? One bad year and your retirement is ruined?
You obviously don't undertsnd investment strategies or how to invest for your future or retirement. If you are under 30, I'd highly suggest you start researching it, and more importantly, start puttting your own money in a retirement plan.
You are correct that I'm down 13% so far this year. Yes, I have made better percentages in previous years. But that wasn't the point of my concern. If the market and banking industry fails, it won't mean squat what I earned in the past, because every dime in my 401K would be gone. Depending on how your money is invested in the fixed mutal funds and other markets, those could take a hit as well.
Could I live on 20K -25K a year instead of 40K? Who knows? How much do you think 25K will be worth in today's dollars 10 - 15 years from now? Even if I have all my 'big ticket items' paid off, 25K may be only enough to pay my grocery bills, taxes, and other standard living expenses. So what, I retire and do nothing but sit around this house I paid off, because I didn't save enough money to travel or pay for hobbies I enjoy? That's why I invest my money to make enough to live the lifestyle I want when I retire. That's why you have a retirement plan.
 
Top