Quote:
Originally Posted by
stdreb27 http:///forum/thread/380296/tea-party-movement/140#post_3311302
you know I find your argument against the tea party quite hilarious. It twists into a fear of a theocracy using the texas booze laws as an example...
You know, lets talk about what the lib's want to ban...
salt, cokes, suv's, incandescent bulbs...
http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2010/09/20/city_may_curb_sales_of_sugary_beverages/
Well, you know all Liberals are tree huggers.
Let's see here:
Salt has been clinically proven to cause high blood pressure, which can lead to heart attacks, which is one of the leading causes of death in men and women over 50.
Coke's contain a high level of sugar, which is known to cause obesity. Kids drink Coke's like water, then sit on their duffs watching TV, playing video games, or sitting on their computers instead of getting out and exercising. This explains why we now have a major fat/obesity problem in this country. Our nickname isn't Fat Antonio for nothing.
SUV's are gas guzzlers, which burn more fossil fuels, and also have larger carbon emissions, which can lead to the depletion of the ozone layer. Of course this is irrelevent to you since you think we have an unlimited supply of oil, and the Global Warming Theory is just a myth.
Incandescent Bulbs are a highly inefficient bulb when compared to LED's and flourescent bulbs. They use almost twice as much electricity, if not more, which in turn causes your Electric Companies to produce more electricity, which again can affect the availability of resources in the future. Of course your logic is, "If I want a $500/month light bill because I want to use inefficient bulbs, that's my right."
If the Reps had their way, they'd be satified to have a bunch of stroke candidates, fat arses, gas wasting cars, and electricity-hog light bulbs - BECAUSE WE CAN!! GLORY, GLORY, HALLELUJAH!