There is no such thing as good versus evil

[jmick]

Originally Posted by Clown Boy
Not at all. It was when persecution started, but before that, it was talked about everywhere.Because it wasn't until after he died, rose, and ascended that the world truly grasped his great significance.There are. Drawings have been found in the ancient underground church.Immediately after the Resurrection, Jesus gave the apostles the commission to spread the Good News. This they did... with passion. Naturally, when they had time in old age would be a good time to write everything.At that time. every educated person, even in the farthest foreign country, knew Greek. Not so with Latin and Hebrew...We aren't. But as with all groups, there are some in there who give it a bad name by the claims they make...
So it was talked about everywhere but written down by on one? Seriously, no one not a soul...odd yes?
So where are these drawings and please don't link an image of an Italian looking fellow.
So by writing them in Greek they'd have greater influence over a much farther reaching realm, as opposed to Latin or Hebrew? So by this deduction, they were actively pushing their religion over a wide spread area and wouldn't embellishing tales of the messiah help push the cult/religion?
I am confused; if he gave them permission why wait to an old age? Wouldn't a person of his magnitude take precedence?

 

[jmick]

Originally Posted by reefreak29
jmic i can give you an answer to your hundreds and hundreds of so called contridictions. the person that wrote all thes down does not understand the bible and is just trying to prove something he cant prove, because of ignorance. did u ac tually reaqd all thes scriptcures yourself there clearly easy to figure out .

The out of context bit is rather amusing. Why, because you can read what ever you like and interpert the bible any way you wish...anything and everything can be taken out of context yes?

 

[reefreak29]

Originally Posted by Jmick
The out of context bit is rather amusing. Why, because you can read what ever you like and interpert the bible any way you wish...anything and everything can be taken out of context yes?
the way your saying it can also be said against the person that wrote these contradictions up, the only difference is i know im right

 

[jmick]

Here is the kicker. Jesus is the Figure Head of Christianity and by embellishing everything and anything he did it gives a more credence to the religion (whether he existed or not). I will give homage to the founders, they did an amazing job. There are few cults/religions that have gained ground faster and more effectively. By incorporating bits of myths and theology from others they created something amazing that to this day give warmth and solace to millions. For the last 2000 years Christains have taken ideas from others to incorporate into the belife system...from X-mas to the Catholic Trinity.

 

[jmick]

Originally Posted by reefreak29
the way your saying it can also be said against the person that wrote these contradictions up, the only difference is i know im right
So you read the bible in context 100% of the time? You have no errors...
Don't you find it odd that one person can read the bible and another can read it and come up with different meanings?

 

[reefreak29]

Originally Posted by Jmick
So you read the bible in context 100% of the time? You have no errors...
i have had alot of errors of interpretation but the more i read the better i understand and i dont think theres one thing that anyone can say to me to make me think that jesus wasnt the son of God who died on the cross for are sins so that we can have eternal life

 

[jmick]

Originally Posted by reefreak29
i have had alot of errors of interpretation but the more i read the better i understand and i dont think theres one thing that anyone can say to me to make me think that jesus wasnt the son of God who died on the cross for are sins so that we can have eternal life
I would not want you to think anything else, if that gives you piece of mind and happiness then that is a wonderful thing. All I have asked for is evidence to support that...with dates and names. Why is he the only MAJOR historical figure that lacks both?

 

[agent-x]

Originally Posted by reefreak29
the only difference is i know im right
because my imaginary friend says so!

 

[reefreak29]

Originally Posted by Jmick
So you read the bible in context 100% of the time? You have no errors...
Don't you find it odd that one person can read the bible and another can read it and come up with different meanings?
the bible is a very long book and very complex its very hard for use humans to understand the full meaning of God or what hes capable of. if we were to even look upon him in all his glory we would die on the spot. how can you even explain stuff like that , are minds are not capable but someday we will understand, even those who dont believe will someday wish they would have

 

[agent-x]

Originally Posted by Jmick
Why is he the only MAJOR historical figure that lacks both?
EXACTLY

 

[agent-x]

Originally Posted by reefreak29
the bible is a very long book and very complex its very hard for use humans to understand the full meaning of God or what hes capable of. if we were to even look upon him in all his glory we would die on the spot. how can you even explain stuff like that , are minds are not capable but someday we will understand, even those who dont believe will someday wish they would have
The only thing I'm having a hard time understanding are your post. Please proof read and/or learn to spell please.

 

[reefreak29]

Originally Posted by Jmick
I would not want you to think anything else, if that gives you piece of mind and happiness then that is a wonderful thing. All I have asked for is evidence to support that...with dates and names. Why is he the only MAJOR historical figure that lacks both?
if there were specifics then there would be no faith and thats not part of Gods plan

 

[agent-x]

Originally Posted by Jmick
So you read the bible in context 100% of the time? You have no errors...
Don't you find it odd that one person can read the bible and another can read it and come up with different meanings?
No silly, they need to be able to manipulate the words as they see fit, duh.

 

[agent-x]

Originally Posted by reefreak29
if there were specifics then there would be no faith and thats not part of Gods plan
Really, it's not part of Gods plan to have people not believe in him? You're kidding right?

 

[reefreak29]

Originally Posted by AGENT-X
The only thing I'm having a hard time understanding are your post. Please proof read and/or learn to spell please.
i cant spell very well , thank you for pointing out my faults

 

[agent-x]

Originally Posted by reefreak29
i cant spell very well , thank you for pointing out my faults
God would want you to spell better. I'm fairly sure of that.

 

[clown boy]

I am retiring for the night, but in the morning I will address those issues. Goodnight, all.

 

[jmick]

Originally Posted by reefreak29
if there were specifics then there would be no faith and thats not part of Gods plan
That is the cope out of the millenium. No no no, that is not historically viable or reasonable to assume. Wouldn't the none believers be void and able to write what they wish, what happened to free will, surely someone would have written his words exactly as he spoke them at the time they were said...right?

 

[agent-x]

Originally Posted by Jmick
That is the cope out of the millenium. No no no, that is not historically viable or reasonable to assume. Wouldn't the none believers be void and able to write what they wish, what happened to free will, surely someone would have written his words exactly as he spoke them at the time they were said...right?
Last time people talked like that they were burned at the stake.

 

[jmick]

Originally Posted by AGENT-X
Last time people talked like that they were burned at the stake.
I thank Jebus that I have a 170lb gaurd dog.