reckler: these scientists know more about other planets and how we can move there to destroy them, but still don't know half of our own oceans and how to save them.
I don't know that scientists have actually found out how to realistically live on other planets yet, it's been researched but I haven't seen anything to support that. Do you have specific support for that?
I don't believe in global warming and I don;t believe these so called scientists
What do you mean by so-called scientists? Do you not believe in all science or do you think there has to be more support than there is at this point because "Two thousand scientists, in a hundred countries, working for more than 20 years in the most elaborate and well-organized scientific collaboration in the history of humankind, have forged an exceptionally strong consensus that all the nations on Earth must work together to solve the crisis of global warming". That quote is from the introduction from An Inconvenient Truth and that is a pretty strong consensus.
Also from An Inconvenient Truth:
•In a study done analyzing the percentage of articles written in peer-reviewed scientific journals that were in doubt as to the cause of global warming, 928 articles about global warming were selected and 0% of them doubted the cause of global warming. (pg. 262)
oAlong side this study a study was done analyzing articles written about global warming in top 4 influential newspapers in America. Of 636 articles (about 18% of articles written about global warming in the past 14 years in these newspapers) over 50% of the articles gave equal weight to the consensus that human beings play a crucial part in global warming and to the view that human beings don’t play any role in global warming.
(pg. 263 inside)
oThis misconception about our role in global warming has been funded by a few influential oil, utility, and coal companies including Exxon Mobil
o“Here was the group’s stated objective: to ‘reposition global warming as theory rather than fact,’” (263).
I was watching this program on the history channel one time about jesus. they said he was married and had kids from the prostute. I was raised in a church and never in my life had any discussions about his WIFE or KIDS.. that is what the scientis are getting paid for, too spread they lies to people who believe it.
Unless I'm wrong (correct me if I am) those were historians not scientists who said that. The difference that historians have to infer and base their ideas on other peoples accounts (eyewitness is not the most reliable form of retrieving information).
When we had our last ice age, was it the cause of humans? NO!
if you notice, everything must come full circle in life. I believe it is written that way. humans or no humans. everything born must end. that is the way it has been from the beginning of time.
Yes, naturals cycles are a part of life, the difference now is that we are acclerating that cycle.
•It took more than 10,000 generations for the human population to reach 2 billion. Then it began to rocket upward from 2 billion to 9 billion in the course of a single lifetime: ours. (AKA the more people on the earth the more we are able to affect the earth)
If it does exsist, don't you think someone will stop it
You're a human being too, why should it be someone else's responsibility to save the life of you and your family?
