Originally Posted by
Scopus Tang
http:///forum/post/2934139
Gooch, sand, especially play sand and sand content is an often debated subject - just hit the search button in the new hobbiest forum and type in sand and see what you get. Some will argue that it is bad - others that they had it for years without problems
. Me personally, I figure why take a chance when I can buy a bag of dry aragonite sand for so little at my not so local *****? Take it for what its worth.
well, for so little is a very subjective term... 90 dollars of ***** sand vs 10-12 dollars of calcium based sand is a significant savings.
I have a post in this forum about southdown-oldcastle (new) playsand which is screened limestone, and on it was mentioned pavestone desert white playsand which is also from limestone. Both of which disolve in vinegar which apparently was the rule of thumb.
So to see one of the more experienced members here saying that using the playsand I mentioned is one of the biggest mistakes that beginners take from these forums you can see why I would be quick to question it.
So basically is it a mistake or not? What is wrong with using calcium based (limestone) sand in my tank and what are the pro's of using the super expensive aragonite pet sand?
Another part of this is I am highly hesitant to spend money on sand that was enormously marked up simply because aquarists desired it. When researching this stuff about how southdown tropical playsand came from the exact same place as the carib sea sand came from but was a small fraction of the price. Now it seems like the non aquarium sand companies were bought out or something so companies like carib sea maintain a monopoly on a commodity that simply shouldnt cost what it does. I really don't like the idea of supporting and perpetuating that.