autofreak44
Active Member
Originally Posted by texanangel
Now, back to my original point, we have warm-cold-warm-cold-warm documented in the world's history (climate I mean). The first warm cycle was early middle ages or so, then cold led to the dark ages, then warm to the rennaisance (yeah, I spelled it wrong I bet), then cold led to the 'little ice age' that spurred migration southward (caused by a volcano I believe), then warm, which we are still living in. The highest recorded carbon was in the early 1900's (from volcanos, I think), not now. I'm not saying that we humans don't need to clean up our act, but we are nothing when compared to the forces of nature. If you really want to understand what it takes to affect the climate, study vulcanology, then you'll understand why it would be so difficult for cars/coal to take the blame. Plus, cows/livestock really do put out a lot of carbon emissions, trust me, my uncle's a dairy farmer. Again, we may be helping it along (I'm not going to bother counting the ways), but so far we are following a standard cycle. The cycle may suck, but that's the way of things. If the world were to stagnate we'd be in far greater trouble. And trust me, having been to many conventions, many/most (approximately 90% and up, I know the stats, and trust me the scientists are being hushed up, but by whom?) scientists don't personally agree with the political stand on global warming. A true scientist would look at the data, look at the fact we have nothing but our current stand point to compare it to, and tell you we don't have the information to come to a conclusion. You have to understand the layers that surround our lovely planet before you can understand how anything more than space dust can affect us adversly. In any case, there is no proven way to change (notice I'm not saying 'help' because I don't know what the earth wants) the co2. Although, if global warming is correct, then the seas get warmer, which makes algae grow (and a ton of it), and down go the co2 ratings.
And for those who are worried about reefs, they won't disappear, they will move. And I'm sure that if the movement is drastic enough, all reef keepers will become instant millionaires with the stock you have at home. Wouldn't you love the job of saving fish and corals from the reef and relocating them to a better home? Heck, if you can create a living reef in your home, I'm sure the government, if only for tourist money, would want you to aquascape their coasts.
i was gonna say something about the whole earth's crazy past, but i was to lazy to research it, so good for you, and thanks
Now, back to my original point, we have warm-cold-warm-cold-warm documented in the world's history (climate I mean). The first warm cycle was early middle ages or so, then cold led to the dark ages, then warm to the rennaisance (yeah, I spelled it wrong I bet), then cold led to the 'little ice age' that spurred migration southward (caused by a volcano I believe), then warm, which we are still living in. The highest recorded carbon was in the early 1900's (from volcanos, I think), not now. I'm not saying that we humans don't need to clean up our act, but we are nothing when compared to the forces of nature. If you really want to understand what it takes to affect the climate, study vulcanology, then you'll understand why it would be so difficult for cars/coal to take the blame. Plus, cows/livestock really do put out a lot of carbon emissions, trust me, my uncle's a dairy farmer. Again, we may be helping it along (I'm not going to bother counting the ways), but so far we are following a standard cycle. The cycle may suck, but that's the way of things. If the world were to stagnate we'd be in far greater trouble. And trust me, having been to many conventions, many/most (approximately 90% and up, I know the stats, and trust me the scientists are being hushed up, but by whom?) scientists don't personally agree with the political stand on global warming. A true scientist would look at the data, look at the fact we have nothing but our current stand point to compare it to, and tell you we don't have the information to come to a conclusion. You have to understand the layers that surround our lovely planet before you can understand how anything more than space dust can affect us adversly. In any case, there is no proven way to change (notice I'm not saying 'help' because I don't know what the earth wants) the co2. Although, if global warming is correct, then the seas get warmer, which makes algae grow (and a ton of it), and down go the co2 ratings.
And for those who are worried about reefs, they won't disappear, they will move. And I'm sure that if the movement is drastic enough, all reef keepers will become instant millionaires with the stock you have at home. Wouldn't you love the job of saving fish and corals from the reef and relocating them to a better home? Heck, if you can create a living reef in your home, I'm sure the government, if only for tourist money, would want you to aquascape their coasts.
i was gonna say something about the whole earth's crazy past, but i was to lazy to research it, so good for you, and thanks
