Originally Posted by Rylan1
why would we fight to tear down the Lincoln memorial?There were not just as many slaves in the north... Second Logic would tell you that there would not be as much of a need for slaves in the North due to the cold climate. Why did slaves want to escape to the North?
Your arguements have no accuracy and are just opinions based your personal view of history. The very person that signed the document to free the slaves....and you ask why we don't fight to tear down the Lincoln Memorial? Your comments are written out very nicely, but it lacks common sense.
Actually if you read Lincoln's essays, decrees, et al. from the time period you will find that he was not the great African-Emancipator everyone makes him out to be. One of several examples (I feel like Journeyman, delivering facts, not just Wikipedia-derived speculation),
"My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that. What I do about slavery, and the colored race, I do because I believe it helps to save the Union; and what I forbear, I forbear because I do not believe it would help to save the Union. I shall do less whenever I shall believe what I am doing hurts the cause, and I shall do more whenever I shall believe doing more will help the cause." The Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln edited by Roy P. Basler, Volume V, "Letter to Horace Greeley" (August 22, 1862), p. 388.
There were many many many slaves in the North. Most historians agree that the large majority of Northern citizens in the US at the time were not abolitionists, like Lincoln, Northerns saw fit to preserve the Union.
Don't get me wrong, the Lincoln Memorial should stay.