Originally Posted by Darth Tang
Ok, using this criteria, what happens with the presidency? A majority rules approach is taken with NO consideration or consolation for the minority. In a democracy, or our case, a representive republic, tha majority rules approach applies in all aspects with the exception of laws. And even then a majority can change the law unless it conflicts with basic human rights.
Not true, our system was actually set up to keep the majority rule of the public in check. They were afraid of the public creating a mob mentality that conlflicted with the best interest of the country, so they stylized a system that wouldn't fluctuate too quickly or easlily with the passing whims of the common citizen. It's supposed to be set up for change to happen gradually, giving time for thoughtful debate and reflection on major chages before they happen. But to still allow for significant change as we evolve. We don't have a true plain majority rule system. Hence the electoral college and the different branches of government to keep each other in check. The supreme court is a lifetime position for the same reasons.
And we all know that consideration for the minority, is, and needs to be taken.