House passed the Health Bill

darthtang aw

Active Member
Originally Posted by GeriDoc
http:///forum/post/3250574
Except that Fascism is extremely anti-left. The socialists and the communists were the first to enjoy fascist hospitality in the camps of Nazi Germany in the 1930's.
The jews were communist Socialist?
 

stdreb27

Active Member
I've yet to figure out how the "brains" have contorted their argument so that somehow, a phylosophy that is based on a limited government and personal freedom, where the government exists to protect the people's unalianble rights of rights liberty and the pursuit of happiness fits into "a political philosophy, movement, or regime (as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition." If anything it is the exact opposite. But hey I don't have a PHD. And don't care who I rub shoulders.
 

stdreb27

Active Member
They did toss Russian communists into concentration camps too... All the while nationalizing major industry...
 

reefraff

Active Member
Originally Posted by bionicarm
http:///forum/post/3250638
I realize there's people out there that are real upset about this health bill reform, but I think some of these Tea Baggers are going a little too far when it comes to voicing thier discontent about the issue...
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/36020850...-capitol_hill/
How do you know it isn't one of your commie democrat friends doing it as a way of making those who oppose their march to socialism? As far as I know nobody has been arrested yet?
 

reefraff

Active Member
Originally Posted by stdreb27
http:///forum/post/3250653
I've yet to figure out how the "brains" have contorted their argument so that somehow, a phylosophy that is based on a limited government and personal freedom, where the government exists to protect the people's unalianble rights of rights liberty and the pursuit of happiness fits into "a political philosophy, movement, or regime (as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition." If anything it is the exact opposite. But hey I don't have a PHD. And don't care who I rub shoulders.
The only thing "right" about fascism is a strong sense of loyalty to the country.
 

sickboy

Active Member
Originally Posted by stdreb27
http:///forum/post/3250472
Do me a favor, if you're going to be slumming around these left wing nutcase websites. Go dig around some conservative websites... Why not go read the heritage foundations stuff.
Just the other day I posted something from Cafe Hayek, that blog is pretty conservative. I'm not biased with sites I read...gotta know both sides of an argument to form an opinion.
 

oscardeuce

Active Member
Originally Posted by bionicarm
http:///forum/post/3250559
I personally don't see how it's legal. The article stated a child as young as 13 doesn't require parental permission for these services this Clinic provides. Where's the money coming from to pay for these services? How can they administer or perform ANY procedure, much less something as intrusive as an abortion, on a child without previous medical history? What if this girl was anemic, or had some blood condition, and she'd bled out during the procedure? Yea, if this would've happened to one of my daughter's, regardless of my position on abortion, I'd have major issues with it.
Being pregnant bumps her to emancipated minor status in my state. Then the minor can consent to pregnancy related issues. I'd have to check the lower age limit, but if you're seeing a pregnant minor, better not tell her mommy or daddy without permission or the HIPAA police will come down on you.
 

reefraff

Active Member
Back in the late 60's and early 70's I knew a lot of so-called liberals, Hippie types. What they believed was a lot different that what passes for liberal today. Those folks didn't want to control nor be controlled
 

geridoc

Well-Known Member
Originally Posted by Darthtang AW
http:///forum/post/3250543
But wait, neither of the programs you speak of are paid for. Neither run budget nuetral. See this is the problem. You can't grasp the concept of actually paying for something or possibly paying for something. Our defecits have ballooned and are only going to get bigger. Do you even understand the reprecussions of the surmounting debt? Do you understand our debt is THE REASON we have to be nice with so many countriees? DO YOU UNDERSTAND OUR DEBT IS THE REASON OUR GOVERNMENT HAVE ALLOWED SO MANY JOBS TO BE SHIPPED OVERSEAS. Do you understand our debt is the reason china, Japan, and every other major nation we trade with can tax our imports but we won't tax their imports?
You just don't friggin get it.
We just spent 900 billion to save 100 billion....so essentially we just added 800 billion to our debt. This money is NOT paid for. It is not accounted for.
When will this stupid country wake up.
Sure, wars create debt, but they end and can be paid off. These social programs do not end, and only grow larger as our population increases.
You want heathcare passed....fine, but pay for it. a 25% tax hike across the board on EVERYONE.....That is what it will require. How do you think that will affect this economy.
See that is the problem with most people today. They don't understand everything is tied together. Sure, you get heathcare,. sure it is government ran. But this bill ALSO affects our relationships with other countries. Why are we involved in so much around the world? Why do we have so many foreign made products? It is because we are OWNED by other countries because people like you want your "free" programs.
So let me ask you...what happens when it is time to pay the piper............
Of course social security is paid for, so don't spout nonsense! It may run out in a few decades because of changing demographics, but it is paid for - there is no debt other than money loaned from current excess collections to the government, hopefully to be paid back later. But it is a pay as you go program.
Gee, those countries that are "THE REASON OUR GOVERNMENT HAVE ALLOWED SO MANY JOBS TO BE SHIPPED OVERSEAS. Do you understand our debt is the reason china, Japan, and every other major nation we trade with can tax our imports but we won't tax their imports?" all deliver universal health care to their citizens. I think I do "friggen get it", but "it" is something very different from whatever it is that evokes such savagery from the far right over the issue of a government caring for its citizens to "promote the general welfare" that I don't "friggen" get, nor do I want to.
You have a lot of strange ideas! The new health plan is not, as you termed it, "government ran". It still depends on physicians and hospitals offering their services to their customers in a competitive environment. The only thing you don't like is that the purchasers of these services have banded together to bargain for better pricing, and to better share their health cost risk. And, please spare us the "well..it is the foot in the door" for liberalism, socialism, communism, or any other devil-related ism in your head. Physicians have a right to be paid for their work, as do hospitals, and consumers have the right to organize to get better pricing.
To answer your last question about paying the piper - I'll worry about that after the kids killed in a fruitless war like Iraq are alive again (despite the fact the, as you put it, war creates debt, but that can be paid off"). My point is that life and health are more important, and I'll pay what it takes to the piper.
 

geridoc

Well-Known Member
Originally Posted by stdreb27
http:///forum/post/3250653
I've yet to figure out how the "brains" have contorted their argument so that somehow, a phylosophy that is based on a limited government and personal freedom, where the government exists to protect the people's unalianble rights of rights liberty and the pursuit of happiness fits into "a political philosophy, movement, or regime (as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition." If anything it is the exact opposite. But hey I don't have a PHD. And don't care who I rub shoulders.
You forgot a phrase - "to promote the general welfare". Was that an oversight?[irony]
 

geridoc

Well-Known Member
Originally Posted by reefraff
http:///forum/post/3250679
How do you know it isn't one of your commie democrat friends doing it as a way of making those who oppose their march to socialism? As far as I know nobody has been arrested yet?
I think it is far right fascists pretending to be liberals masquerading as ultra conservatives...Wow, someone forgot to take their anti--paranoia meds today.
 

reefraff

Active Member
Originally Posted by GeriDoc
http:///forum/post/3250809
I think it is far right fascists pretending to be liberals masquerading as ultra conservatives...Wow, someone forgot to take their anti--paranoia meds today.
What proof do you or Bionic have it was the "tea baggers"? doing any of that? Like I posted they don't know who did it but now the left has a new whipping boy that blame Bush has expired.
 

geridoc

Well-Known Member
Originally Posted by reefraff
http:///forum/post/3250818
What proof do you or Bionic have it was the "tea baggers"? doing any of that? Like I posted they don't know who did it but now the left has a new whipping boy that blame Bush has expired.
Of course I don't have any proof of who did it, any more than I have proof that Muslim extremists flew two airplanes into the World Trade Center. However, in the absence of any evidence to the contrary, one is justified in assuming that things are as they look. I anxiously await evidence of a leftist conspiracy here, just as I expect that it will turn out to be Jews that flew the planes into the WTC and the Pentagon. Either way, he entire tone of the debate turned way too angry for me, regardless of left, right or middle. More than anything I regret (and resent) the loss of mutual respect and reasonable discourse that has arisen (and I am emphatically NOT pointing fingers) between all sides recent times.
 

stdreb27

Active Member
hmm, I wasn't quoting the Preamble of the Constitution. Being that I was addressing an idea not a mechanism...
but come on, welfare in 1776 didn't mean take from the rich and and use that as a crutch so the poor stay poor...
 

reefraff

Active Member
Originally Posted by GeriDoc
http:///forum/post/3250861
Of course I don't have any proof of who did it, any more than I have proof that Muslim extremists flew two airplanes into the World Trade Center. However, in the absence of any evidence to the contrary, one is justified in assuming that things are as they look. I anxiously await evidence of a leftist conspiracy here, just as I expect that it will turn out to be Jews that flew the planes into the WTC and the Pentagon. Either way, he entire tone of the debate turned way too angry for me, regardless of left, right or middle. More than anything I regret (and resent) the loss of mutual respect and reasonable discourse that has arisen (and I am emphatically NOT pointing fingers) between all sides recent times.
You obviously missed the point of my response then. Just as it would be absurd to assume it was a left wing plot to frame the right it is just as absurd to assume it was a member of the tea party. There are plenty of folk who oppose this fiasco who have nothing to do with the tea party.
 
Top