House passed the Health Bill

reefraff

Active Member
Originally Posted by stdreb27
http:///forum/post/3250908
hmm, I wasn't quoting the Preamble of the Constitution. Being that I was addressing an idea not a mechanism...
but come on, welfare in 1776 didn't mean take from the rich and and use that as a crutch so the poor stay poor...
If you allow the poor to become self sufficient how do you expect to sucker them into voting for you with empty promises? :)
 

geridoc

Well-Known Member
Originally Posted by stdreb27
http:///forum/post/3250908
hmm, I wasn't quoting the Preamble of the Constitution. Being that I was addressing an idea not a mechanism...
but come on, welfare in 1776 didn't mean take from the rich and and use that as a crutch so the poor stay poor...
Actually, SCOTUS has held that the "general welfare" clause refers to the health of The People.
 

geridoc

Well-Known Member
Originally Posted by reefraff
http:///forum/post/3250911
You obviously missed the point of my response then. Just as it would be absurd to assume it was a left wing plot to frame the right it is just as absurd to assume it was a member of the tea party. There are plenty of folk who oppose this fiasco who have nothing to do with the tea party.
Agreed! I missed the irony in your orriginal post.
 

bionicarm

Active Member
Do they know for sure it was a tea party activist that did some of these things? Not sure. But this is what I read in the article:
"Tea party activists
had posted the brother's address online thinking it was the congressman's home. The post urged opponents to drop by and "express their thanks" for the Democrat's vote in favor of the sweeping health care reform.
Nigel Coleman, chairman of the Danville Tea Party, said he re-posted the comment that originated on another conservative blog, including the address, Monday on his Facebook page. The posts were taken down after the mistake was discovered. "
So I guess all these nutcases and extremists just peruse Tea Party Activists web sites and blogs looking for information on where to locate a Congressmen who voted 'yes' on the bill. It surely couldn't just be one of the followers.
 

scsinet

Active Member
Originally Posted by bionicarm
http:///forum/post/3250638
I realize there's people out there that are real upset about this health bill reform, but I think some of these Tea Baggers are going a little too far when it comes to voicing thier discontent about the issue...
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/36020850...-capitol_hill/
I agree with you. Violence, vandalism, threats, slurs, etc are no way to either accomplish anything or get anyone to take you seriously, and they do nothing more than perpetuate the [mistaken] idea that conservatives are parties of hate.
 

oscardeuce

Active Member
Originally Posted by GeriDoc
http:///forum/post/3250807
The Jews came later. The principal thrust of the Nazi philosophy was anti-communist and anti-socialist.

Geridoc,
Are you forgetting Nazi= National Socialist? Why would an antisocialist party call themselves the same?
The principle thrust was to recover German pride and honor after the Treaty of Versailles. That allowed Hitler and his ilk to take over power. Then they went nuts.
 

stdreb27

Active Member
Originally Posted by SCSInet
http:///forum/post/3250942
I agree with you. Violence, vandalism, threats, slurs, etc are no way to either accomplish anything or get anyone to take you seriously, and they do nothing more than perpetuate the [mistaken] idea that conservatives are parties of hate.
Personally I don't buy it. With all those cameras pointed at the Nancy pelosi and Jessi Jackson, how could not one of them have captured anything... All we have to go on is the WORD of a politician and a con artist (yes Jessi Jackson is a con artist). How many times have we seen these same accusations about the "dangerous right wing extreemists." only to turn out after the fact that it was a plant...
This is the Ruben Translation... We can't defend our policy based on logic, so what we are going to do it try and turn the opposition into terrorists. That way we can say, so you side with the terrorists?
A complete revision of reality worked when they suddenly decided to do a 180 and attack the war based on the "lack" of WMD. Even though they'd been saying the exact same things since the Clinton administratoion. Why not try it again...
 

fishtaco

Active Member
So you people are going to completely deny there are any bad apples in the Tea Party movement? I also wonder why Boehner is on tv denouncing it if it is not real, because he has a real record in the last year of doing anything to help the dems, right?
For me it is pretty easy to trace this behavior straight back to the folks at the Palin rallies and her refusal to do anything but cheer the hatred on. Her facebook or PAC page right now is urging Americans to "reload"
Sorry, but one of the best things about this country is the peaceful tranfer of power between parties and I hope all these people phoning in death threats to politicians like federal prison.
Fishtaco (frankly I would be embarressed to call myself a liberal or conservative these days)
 

geridoc

Well-Known Member
Originally Posted by stdreb27
http:///forum/post/3250957
How many times have we seen these same accusations about the "dangerous right wing extreemists." only to turn out after the fact that it was a plant...
I don't know, how many times? I can't recall any instances of this.
 

stdreb27

Active Member
Originally Posted by GeriDoc
http:///forum/post/3251001
I don't know, how many times? I can't recall any instances of this.
I can think of about 3 or 4 times over the last couple of years... Remember that time, Nancy called the tea party activists a buncha nazis? That was a dem with those signs...
 

stdreb27

Active Member
Originally Posted by Fishtaco
http:///forum/post/3250993
So you people are going to completely deny there are any bad apples in the Tea Party movement? I also wonder why Boehner is on tv denouncing it if it is not real, because he has a real record in the last year of doing anything to help the dems, right?
For me it is pretty easy to trace this behavior straight back to the folks at the Palin rallies and her refusal to do anything but cheer the hatred on. Her facebook or PAC page right now is urging Americans to "reload"
Sorry, but one of the best things about this country is the peaceful tranfer of power between parties and I hope all these people phoning in death threats to politicians like federal prison.
Fishtaco (frankly I would be embarressed to call myself a liberal or conservative these days)
When the whole movement is being cast in that light, absolutely. I don't see riots in the streets, I don't see books being written about assasination or theatrical performances... We saw that with Bush... You're always going to have a random nutcase glom onto some movement. But I've been to rallies for both sides. And let me tell you from personal experience, democrat rallies have not been family safe. While the conservative rallies I'd have no problem taking little kids. Because it was a whole different ball of wax.
And if you wanna talk peaceful transfer of power. These guys weren't voting republican...
The Obama administration by letting them off without procecusion condoned the actions.
This whole salacious "oh dems are fearing for their lives" template that the media is running with, is simply, the latest attempt to divert the argument away from the issues at hand, a bill designed to phase out private funding for health care. And villainize a serious, serious problem for the Democrats. The American people....
 

darthtang aw

Active Member
Originally Posted by GeriDoc
http:///forum/post/3250805
Of course social security is paid for, so don't spout nonsense! It may run out in a few decades because of changing demographics, but it is paid for - there is no debt other than money loaned from current excess collections to the government, hopefully to be paid back later. But it is a pay as you go program.

You obviously do not pay attention very well.
http://interact.stltoday.com/blogzon...cit-this-year/
You have a lot of strange ideas! The new health plan is not, as you termed it, "government ran". It still depends on physicians and hospitals offering their services to their customers in a competitive environment. The only thing you don't like is that the purchasers of these services have banded together to bargain for better pricing, and to better share their health cost risk. And, please spare us the "well..it is the foot in the door" for liberalism, socialism, communism, or any other devil-related ism in your head. Physicians have a right to be paid for their work, as do hospitals, and consumers have the right to organize to get better pricing.
No that is what I actually like, the exchange idea is fine. It is the other crap involved. The cuts to medicare....basically eliminating an option for the elderly. The paying of certain states medicaid while not paying others. The federal government can't even cover the medicare cost now, and now they are shouldering more? The so called "fines" on individuals that do not have healthcare. 95 dollars a year as a fine isn't jack and will not prevent people from using the emergency room as a clinic and then skipping out on the bill. Many businesses will see it is cheaper to the pay the payroll tax for not offerring heathcare and drop the coverage. Forcing more people to shoulder more of their heath burden since businesses usually pick up a good portion of the cost. Most businesses pick up atleast 50% of the cost....will the exchange be 50% cheaper? Doubt it. If it is, that is a lot of government subsidy (control). I thought Obama said I could keep my coverage if I like it. Not if the company I work for drops it.
You speak of competition? Yet unless you join the exchange and qualify for it, there is no state to state competition. You do not get quotes from hospitals ahead of time...therefore you walk in blind to what you may be charged. It created this exchange, but what insurance companies will join an exchange where they have to charge cheaper prices than to the regular consumer. Can someone tell me what forces these providers to join the exchange, and why would they do it if it is optional if they are forced to cover everyone at a reduced rate....including people like the 700 lb. chick that is eating herself to death.
This bill does nothing to address the illegal immigrant drain on the system either. The government has already failed to properly fund medicade and medicare...running deficits on each. Yet they claim this is paid for....but here is the catch. we are paying for it over the course of ten years, but only get to actually use the program 6 of those years. Would you purchase insurance in any form under those guidelines?
And sorry, the foot in the door fits. Social security started off as voluntary (sound familiar?)....then became mandatory, then over time money paid in was not returned in full. Basically every dollar paid in got back 60 some odd cents. Oh, and while the government was at it, they changed the original retirement age and increased it over time....thus forcing us to pay in longer under the mandatory system and seeing less of our money back in the end. But see this doesn't bother you. You actually would enjoy a complete healthcare take over by the government.
To answer your last question about paying the piper - I'll worry about that after the kids killed in a fruitless war like Iraq are alive again (despite the fact the, as you put it, war creates debt, but that can be paid off"). My point is that life and health are more important, and I'll pay what it takes to the piper.
Define life and health. Because as I see it, our troops are protecting life and health......oh wait....those people don't count.
 

stdreb27

Active Member
You're fooling yourself if you think this bill won't result in government run healthcare. This bill manipulates the market so that insurance companies will be put out of business due to new rules and regulations. The whole point of this bill is to create a problem so that the government can step in as saviors to "fix" the problem by creating a government run system.
 

fishtaco

Active Member
Originally Posted by stdreb27
http:///forum/post/3251006
When the whole movement is being cast in that light, absolutely. I don't see riots in the streets, I don't see books being written about assasination or theatrical performances... We saw that with Bush... You're always going to have a random nutcase glom onto some movement. But I've been to rallies for both sides. And let me tell you from personal experience, democrat rallies have not been family safe. While the conservative rallies I'd have no problem taking little kids. Because it was a whole different ball of wax.
And if you wanna talk peaceful transfer of power. These guys weren't voting republican...
The Obama administration by letting them off without procecusion condoned the actions.
This whole salacious "oh dems are fearing for their lives" template that the media is running with, is simply, the latest attempt to divert the argument away from the issues at hand, a bill designed to phase out private funding for health care. And villainize a serious, serious problem for the Democrats. The American people....
First of all, you people have got to stop using what the far-left does as an excuse or a "we are not that bad" deal because I am a former moderate Republican and now a independent voter, so that arguement carries very little weight with me and we are talking about the Tea Party not the Far-Left.
Secondly I disagree that it is just a "few" bad apples in the party and the movement has also since it morphed from what Ron Paul started into what it is now refused to address the actions of any of it's more radical members. Sorry but when I see someone with a sign with a AR-15 on it and a threat of next time coming armed, I take that as a threat to myself and this country and if Obama is everything they accuse him of, then just like any other dictatorship, those people would be swept up by secret police and never seen again. I do agree that the Dems are running with the crap that happened this weekend, but for a bunch of people who think they have the right ideas for government, then you would think that they would be smart enough to tone down the rhetoric on their signs and curb their actions enough so they are not giving ammunition to their sworn political enemies.
I would also like to address what American means since the Tea Party is 99% percent white and conservative, seems like somewhere along the line somebody forgot that America is a melting pot and all Americans that care would be for honest government, term limits and less spending and taxes. I know I am, but at this point I would never even think about throwing my hat in with the Tea Party and neither it seems do any other minorities. If these Tea Parties are a friendly and good hearted as everyone claims why is it a sea of white conservatives faces only?
As always people are focusing way too much on the red or blue instead of the red, white and blue.
Fishtaco
 

reefraff

Active Member

Originally Posted by bionicarm
http:///forum/post/3250938
Do they know for sure it was a tea party activist that did some of these things? Not sure. But this is what I read in the article:
"Tea party activists
had posted the brother's address online thinking it was the congressman's home. The post urged opponents to drop by and "express their thanks" for the Democrat's vote in favor of the sweeping health care reform.
Nigel Coleman, chairman of the Danville Tea Party, said he re-posted the comment that originated on another conservative blog, including the address, Monday on his Facebook page. The posts were taken down after the mistake was discovered. "
So I guess all these nutcases and extremists just peruse Tea Party Activists web sites and blogs looking for information on where to locate a Congressmen who voted 'yes' on the bill. It surely couldn't just be one of the followers.

Republican Eric Canter had his office shot last night, Obviously the work of the Obamite Zombies following the orders of The head of the DNC who is using the reports of violence as a propaganda tool
 

reefraff

Active Member
Originally Posted by Fishtaco
http:///forum/post/3250993
So you people are going to completely deny there are any bad apples in the Tea Party movement? I also wonder why Boehner is on tv denouncing it if it is not real, because he has a real record in the last year of doing anything to help the dems, right?
For me it is pretty easy to trace this behavior straight back to the folks at the Palin rallies and her refusal to do anything but cheer the hatred on. Her facebook or PAC page right now is urging Americans to "reload"
Sorry, but one of the best things about this country is the peaceful tranfer of power between parties and I hope all these people phoning in death threats to politicians like federal prison.
Fishtaco (frankly I would be embarressed to call myself a liberal or conservative these days)
For all the liberal sniveling and whining about those mean ol tea partyers calling them mean names not one of the cameras or reporters in the crowd heard anything. The only thing the camera's did catch was the reaction of one congressman who indeed does think he was spit on. In a crowd of hundreds if one person acted the fool, heck lets say 5 did, is it fair to label the whole group?
 

fishtaco

Active Member
Originally Posted by reefraff
http:///forum/post/3251022
Republican Eric Canter had his office shot last night, Obviously the work of the Obamite Zombies following the orders of The head of the DNC who is using the reports of violence as a propaganda tool
I'm sure it was Obamamite Zombies, but what does this have to do with the Tea Party other than prove that both conservatives and libs can take things too far. It in no way dismisses any bad behavior by the Tea Party and frankly Reef I think better of you than what you have done in this post of pointing fingers.
Fishtaco
 

reefraff

Active Member
Originally Posted by stdreb27
http:///forum/post/3251012
you're fooling yourself if you think this bill won't result in government run healthcare. This bill manipulates the market so that insurance companies will be put out of business due to new rules and regulations. The whole point of this bill is to create a problem so that the government can step in as saviors to "fix" the problem by creating a government run system.
zactly!!!
 
Top