Originally Posted by
jpa0741
http:///forum/post/2947460
I was not saying to T your return line but put a T in your drain line. There is no need for 2 pumps in your sump/fuge. Just direct a low amount of the return to the fuge and the rest to the skimmer.
Ahh glad we cleared that up...that's a relief. Now I can concentrate on that 1800gph pump, and T the drain line instead.
Originally Posted by jpa0741
http:///forum/post/2947465
Your fuge is a bit tall, but I think it will be fine. You can put alot of LR in it. The thing I would change is the baffle closest to the return pump on the fuge side should have been shorter. As you stated I am not sure if it will be ok with a low flow. As far as the spacing, I really don't know how much 1" spacing can handle.
yes, I agree, it could be better with lower baffles....however,the water is a thin sheet and I get no bubles. Since I had broken the intended 10" peice I stuck in the 16"er instead. I will empty the sump, and cut the 16" out and replace it with a 10" to match the height of the oposite side. I just put in a few more 300gph pumps and the 1/2" side and it did fine.
I cant really test the 1" side since I dont have enough house pumps to come anywhere near stressing it out.
But considering I have 2x 1.5" drains...and only %70 of thier total usable volume pumping back up... a 12"wide baffle 1" deep will more than cover the volume.
Correct my math if I'm wrong.... 3.14x(1.5squared) is the water flow area on the stand pipes. Which equals me needing a 14.13" wide baffle that's an inch Deep, but since I'm not using the total pipes volume. I initially planned on roughly %75 which would be approximately 1950GPH flowing into that tank. I would need to have a baffle system that allows 1950, which would in reality need to be 10.59" well under the 12" wide I have available.
Now that is solid math, as far as I can tell. the baffles were large enough to accommodate my original plan.
And as a bonus...JPA tells me he meant something slightly different..."T" the water at the drain, so if I split off 400GPH to the fuge...I am given evin more freedom of flexibility. Since now the volume of water going into the skimmer side will be reduced evin further. And 400GPH would be a minimum...I'm actually entertaining having the scrubber run the full length of the Fuge...18" wide scrubber means I would need 630GPH bleeding off into it. And that, I believe is more than adequate for a fuge, and yet wont come anywhere near to stressing out a 1/2" deep baffle system.
With 2600GPH worth of drain pipes, and 630 going to the fuge...I think both sides are more than enough to handle the water flow.
Again, I am going to rip out that 16" baffle, see no error in anyone's logic on that. Ill put a 10" in its stead.