Anybody ever think that what is touted as science today, ends up being dead wrong 10 years from now? Science is an evolving study of "truths". 50 years ago, if your heart stopped beating, you were considered dead. And now, we know that is wrong.
I think if the family in unison agreed to disconnect the feeding tube, then that would be fine, but what exactly was the "point" for her husband, who has more than moved on in life, to go to these lengths and hurt this woman's family? This is a nightmare for her parents who will likely never recover.
If you do not want life support used, then the law requires you to put it in writing. And that is the way it should be. In this case, Terry was not on "life support". She was being feed via a feeding tube, just like so many others are. She was breathing on her own and even reacting to others. Didn't everyone see her face on TV a million times? To me she had her eyes open, she had eye movement, facial reactions and seemed to be responding to her family.
Bottom line, I don't see why her husband pursued this issue with such a vengence when her family was so opposed to it. If he wanted to move on, which he did anyway, then get a lawyer and get a divorce or whatever.
Everyone says when they able-bodied and healthy that they don't want to live that way.....but when it comes right down to it, does anyone other than the effected person have the right to pull tubes? How many of you would want your spouse, who had "moved on in life" to make that decision for you???
I think if the family in unison agreed to disconnect the feeding tube, then that would be fine, but what exactly was the "point" for her husband, who has more than moved on in life, to go to these lengths and hurt this woman's family? This is a nightmare for her parents who will likely never recover.
If you do not want life support used, then the law requires you to put it in writing. And that is the way it should be. In this case, Terry was not on "life support". She was being feed via a feeding tube, just like so many others are. She was breathing on her own and even reacting to others. Didn't everyone see her face on TV a million times? To me she had her eyes open, she had eye movement, facial reactions and seemed to be responding to her family.
Bottom line, I don't see why her husband pursued this issue with such a vengence when her family was so opposed to it. If he wanted to move on, which he did anyway, then get a lawyer and get a divorce or whatever.
Everyone says when they able-bodied and healthy that they don't want to live that way.....but when it comes right down to it, does anyone other than the effected person have the right to pull tubes? How many of you would want your spouse, who had "moved on in life" to make that decision for you???