pontius
Active Member
Originally Posted by Rylan1
In all fairness, you can't blame Clinton, Bush1, or Reagan for not capturing and containing Bin Laden because none of them could have forseen the events of 911 and Bin Laden being capable of that. I do believe that we had the chance to get him after the fact, but we failed and missed the opportunities we did have.
you are right on Bush1 and Reagan, but not on Clinton. Clinton does bare some of the blame becuse bin laden was behind the USS Cole and the African embassy bombing and several other attacks while Clinton was in office. while Bush1 and Reagan were in office, bin laden was not a threat to the US.
In all fairness, you can't blame Clinton, Bush1, or Reagan for not capturing and containing Bin Laden because none of them could have forseen the events of 911 and Bin Laden being capable of that. I do believe that we had the chance to get him after the fact, but we failed and missed the opportunities we did have.
you are right on Bush1 and Reagan, but not on Clinton. Clinton does bare some of the blame becuse bin laden was behind the USS Cole and the African embassy bombing and several other attacks while Clinton was in office. while Bush1 and Reagan were in office, bin laden was not a threat to the US.