Originally Posted by
stdreb27
http:///forum/post/2878166
The simple fact is (speaking pure economics here not about you personally), if without market manipulation you wouldn't be making 65k then you aren't worth 65k.Without market manipulation who is to say what is the value of any given service or product?
I'm just pointing out that what unions do is no different then a cartel, ologopoly or in some states a monopoly. They are typically legally protected. And NOT an action of the free market (in todays market).I would disagree,in my field and in my state we have both union and non companies doing the same jobs,however when its a big job" subdivision of a few hundred homes ,sky scrapers,nuke,coal, steel facilities....." my union is able to provide large numbers of skilled ,qualified,safety oriented carpenters
And me the dramatics? In areas where relocation to detroit is not an option, union free automakers from Japan seem to be paying their workers quiet well. After all Ghettelfinger (quite stupidly, and I doubt accurately), tried to make a point non-union autoworkers working for the Japs made more money than his union members. Some poverty...
Unfortunately for me the Japanese aren't here building so i guess i'm out of luck?
And no my question is not distorted. Or inaccurate.
The definition of a monopoly is a commodity controlled by one party.My union doesn't fit that description
In this case labor is a commodity.I guess,if you view people as commodities If you are working in a shop where when you get hired you are required to join the union. Or look for a job elsewhere That is labor controlled by one party.That would be the party that does the work,if management doesn't like it they are free to form a pencil pusher union.... lol
.