Gay Marriage, Abortion and other moral issue?

darthtang aw

Active Member
Originally Posted by Pontius
without going any further off topic and starting the long debate, it ALL boils down to this.....3000 Americans died on 9/11. Bush used this as his primary grounds for attacking Saddam. no one involved in 9/11 were in Iraq or had the backing of Saddam. so the 2 of the 3 main culprits of 9/11 remain at large, while our military is spread too thin in Iraq.
From the mouth of Our president after 9/11 "From this day forward, any nation that continues to harbor or support terrorism will be regarded by the United States as a hostile regime."
From the mouth of Vladamir Putin "I can confirm that after the events of September 11, 2001, and up to the military operation in Iraq, Russian special services and Russian intelligence several times received...information that official organs of Saddam's regime were preparing terrorist acts on the territory of the United States and beyond its borders, at U.S. military and civilian locations."
 

darthtang aw

Active Member
Originally Posted by jennythebugg
how do we know they didnt write what THEY wanted to?
..It is not called "faith" for nothing.
Editted to not be seen an accusation or pointing fingers.
 

jovial

Member
We dont, this is why religion is based completely on faith. I believe the new testament to be a good guide for myself and I pray a lot. For me it seems to work, but I dont fault others who disagree, it's their choice really.
 

reefreak29

Active Member
Originally Posted by MIKE22cha
Reefreak29, here is what I think. Yes sin has the oppurtunity to run rampid, but God let sin run rampid here on earth. He let us make the desicion to sin, so if America is sins, God will judge them for it like He will judge us. sorry i just cant sit back and so oh well, let God sort it out
Another way I see it, if abortion becomes illegal, then the procedure will not be in such a clean enviroment and done by good doctors, which could cause its own problems and own deaths.
thats ok it will be performed much less
 

1journeyman

Active Member
Folks I deleted a lot of threads...
Discussing religion, Bible, etc. is fine. Pointing fingers and saying who is or isn't going to Hell is not.
If you want to have a civil discourse on faith, fallability of Scripture, etc. feel free to start a thread on it. Just don't try to convert or condem others.
 

seasalt101

Active Member
Originally Posted by Pontius
without going any further off topic and starting the long debate, it ALL boils down to this.....3000 Americans died on 9/11. Bush used this as his primary grounds for attacking Saddam. no one involved in 9/11 were in Iraq or had the backing of Saddam. so the 2 of the 3 main culprits of 9/11 remain at large, while our military is spread too thin in Iraq.
you're right that Germany, France, and Russia had a lot to lose with the fall of Iraq. they also have a lot to gain by the fall of the US, and we are not as strong now as were were then.
you can't measure how safe this country is because no other attacks have happened since 2001. you have to look at potential holes....like the borders that Bush refuses to close. like the military and the national guard being spread thin across the world.
most people who were pro-war in 2002 have now admitted they were wrong. Bush knew all along and refuses to admit it. now of course, you could JUSTIFY the war. but in light of 9/11, our military needed to be elsewhere.
as far as the millions of Iraqis celebrated freedom, there was a report on last night about the millions of Iraqi refugees fleeing to Syria and Jordan for fear of their lives and how it's taxing the systems of those countries. and there are stories everyday of women and children being blown up in streets.
you say are military is spread thin but our borders are not secure so i am thinking you would like to pull out of iraq and what put the military on our borders instead is this a correct analogy?
 

1journeyman

Active Member
Originally Posted by Pontius
...most people who were pro-war in 2002 have now admitted they were wrong. Bush knew all along and refuses to admit it. now of course, you could JUSTIFY the war. but in light of 9/11, our military needed to be elsewhere....
So after all of those quotes and sources you can still say "Bush knew all along and refuses to admit it". It seems to me at this point you're arguing based on emotion and opinion rather then fact.
I tried my best to answer each of your accusations with facts. I would like to see yours proving the President knew and lied.
 

pontius

Active Member
Originally Posted by seasalt101
you say are military is spread thin but our borders are not secure so i am thinking you would like to pull out of iraq and what put the military on our borders instead is this a correct analogy?
the border laws are not currently being enforced. a lot of that could be handled if the border patrol were just allowed to do their jobs. but we would definitely be better served having the NATIONAL Guard on the border rather than in Iraq (afterall, does "National" not mean "within the Nation"). and of course, border security IS a national security concern. and the primary military focus should be in Afghanistan and the bordering area of Pakistan, looking for the 9/11 culprits. afterall, was not that our main reasoning for going to war to begin with? not to mention that the current military issue in Iraq has only strengthened and emboldened Iran, who is much more of a concern than Saddam ever was.
 

darthtang aw

Active Member
Originally Posted by 1journeyman
I tried my best to answer each of your accusations with facts. I would like to see yours proving the President knew and lied.

You know that won't happen, while I disagree with the president on a lot of things there has been no committee nor commission to date to prove he doctored things and lied. If this was the case the congress would have already impeached him over it....
 

pontius

Active Member
Originally Posted by 1journeyman
So after all of those quotes and sources you can still say "Bush knew all along and refuses to admit it". It seems to me at this point you're arguing based on emotion and opinion rather then fact.
I tried my best to answer each of your accusations with facts. I would like to see yours proving the President knew and lied.
there is much evidence that supports the fact that Rumsfeld and others in Bush's admin (therefore, Bush himself) were willing to accept any loose straw to connect Al Qaeda and Saddam Hussein together. there has been A LOT of evidence showing this. I can search some of it out for you, or you could find it for yourself. just google "Iraq war" and look at all the evidence. we were misled by Bush. there have even been documents released stating that Bush wanted to invade Iraq from the minute he became president.
 

pontius

Active Member
Originally Posted by Darthtang AW
From the mouth of Our president after 9/11 "From this day forward, any nation that continues to harbor or support terrorism will be regarded by the United States as a hostile regime."
From the mouth of Vladamir Putin "I can confirm that after the events of September 11, 2001, and up to the military operation in Iraq, Russian special services and Russian intelligence several times received...information that official organs of Saddam's regime were preparing terrorist acts on the territory of the United States and beyond its borders, at U.S. military and civilian locations."
good lord, you're now quoting Putin as a credible source? the former head of the KGB who is VERY anti-US? how strong of an ally has he ever been to us? you don't think some of that could have been planted eh
 

michaeltx

Moderator
I am going to way in abit.
1) The war may have started out as a terrorist erradication war but has gotten into a stagnant cycle. But one thing we have to remember we dont really hear the good stuff that has come over only the bombings and deaths make the news here. I do agree that the cycle is not going to be broken anytime soon because what I see and read the iraqi goverment has its own internal problems that I dont see getting fixed anytime soon!!!!
2) the subjects of gay marriage and abortion there are many veiw points on pro and cons of both. I dont think however it should be part of the election process or debates. I mean come on what really effects our lives a couple of guys or girls that want to have equal rights or outrageous taxes. BTW is 10% here. and almost 3$ a gallon for gas. how about the economy and eviroment issues, the war issues where our freinds and family are dying for freedom, how about unemployment and outsourceing, child abductions and crime. The list goes on and on and on. To me there are many many many other things that need more attention than debating something only a higher power can judge people for.
which brings me to the last point.
for every one that brings religion into a debate or forum how about remembering that we are not here to judge other people but to let God be the judge of what is in someones soul and heart. let those with out sin cast the first stone and I honestly do not know anyone that can say that they can cast the first stone.
just my 2 cents
Mike
 

pontius

Active Member
Originally Posted by Jovial
Im a Christian and personally believe it is wrong but if you want to be gay, great just dont ask me to accept it, tolerance is one thing acceptance is another.
by that token, why would you expect anyone to "accept" your Christianity? "acceptance" and "tolerance" are 2 way streets. otherwise, we're nothing but fascists.
 

hagfish

Active Member
I don't know how you can read John chapter 1 and not determine that what is in the bible is what God wants in it. Here's a couple verses that relate to the topic closely.
1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
14 The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[d] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.
 

darthtang aw

Active Member
Originally Posted by Pontius
good lord, you're now quoting Putin as a credible source? the former head of the KGB who is VERY anti-US? how strong of an ally has he ever been to us? you don't think some of that could have been planted eh
You stated there was only our intel and English intel backing up the reasons for Iraq. I gave you other intel sources and you attack and discredit One, and that is supposed to debunk the fact that Germany and France both had found the same intel we did.
Furthermore, if you question Putin why didn't you question Hussein and still question why he was hindering the inspectors time and time again. This argument you repeatedly put forth is is just Political propoganda put out by a party and spoon fed to the masses to make one party loook completely bad.
Let me ask you this, the last two elections did you vote for your senator that sat on the senate floor in 2002? Ifr so who was that senator.
The reason I ask....Only 6 democrats actually read the intel given to them before the lead up to the Iraq war....was yours one of them? Doubt it...Did you do something about their incopetance? Doubt, no it is easier to put the whole blame on BUSH....Bottomline, if you blame the President you also better blame you congressman and vote to change that as well....I realize S.Carolina is currently hold two republican seats...but not sure if they held those in 2002
 

1journeyman

Active Member
Originally Posted by Darthtang AW
The reason I ask....Only 6 democrats actually read the intel given to them before the lead up to the Iraq war....
I heard that too... that terrifies me. What exactly are our politicians doing besides figuring out ways t ospend money and get re-elected?
 

maxalmon

Active Member
Ok, let me get this strait (I had to)
This is me as a christian >

This is good old fashioned gay me >

And this is where I'm going
?
Well, that just blows

.
Wow, I'll stop doing all the good things that I do, like raising money for the local childrens cancer research, Heaven can wait pet sanctuary etc....Cause if I'm going to be punished for being a good person, then I might as well start acting like a really bad person...LOL
.
As if I really care what anyone else has to say about how I live my life, all I want are my equal rights, and trust me, we are never going to just go "poof" and go away, at some point it will be legal....They used to say that "women would never be allowed to vote".
.
Get this, HUGE problem in our house, I'm a dedicated Democrate and my partner is a

[hr]
Republican.
 

seasalt101

Active Member
as far as human issues go i do not like abortion, but it is the womans choice her body theory, gay lifesyles live and let live it's not for me but who am i to condone one's happiness, i while recovering from cancer smoked some pot to get an appetite back, i was down to 140lbs., i am normally 210-215, it worked for me even though the goverment says it will lead to bigger drugs i guess they were right when i was undergoing chemotherapy i was issued 25 miligrams of delatted every 2 hours quite the drug, but the only thing that made my weight come back was the pot i am now 180lbs. so if it doesn't bother anyone else it should not be a governments choice but each individual...tobin
 

jennythebugg

Active Member
Originally Posted by maxalmon
Ok, let me get this strait (I had to)
This is me as a christian >

This is good old fashioned gay me >

And this is where I'm going
?
Well, that just blows

.
Wow, I'll stop doing all the good things that I do, like raising money for the local childrens cancer research, Heaven can wait pet sanctuary etc....Cause if I'm going to be punished for being a good person, then I might as well start acting like a really bad person...LOL
.
As if I really care what anyone else has to say about how I live my life, all I want are my equal rights, and trust me, we are never going to just go "poof" and go away, at some point it will be legal....They used to say that "women would never be allowed to vote".
.
Get this, HUGE problem in our house, I'm a dedicated Democrate and my partner is a

[hr]
Republican.
wow same in our house...tobin is a staunch republican and i am ...well non political i guess
 

pontius

Active Member
Originally Posted by Darthtang AW
You stated there was only our intel and English intel backing up the reasons for Iraq. I gave you other intel sources and you attack and discredit One, and that is supposed to debunk the fact that Germany and France both had found the same intel we did.
Furthermore, if you question Putin why didn't you question Hussein and still question why he was hindering the inspectors time and time again. This argument you repeatedly put forth is is just Political propoganda put out by a party and spoon fed to the masses to make one party loook completely bad.
Let me ask you this, the last two elections did you vote for your senator that sat on the senate floor in 2002? Ifr so who was that senator.
The reason I ask....Only 6 democrats actually read the intel given to them before the lead up to the Iraq war....was yours one of them? Doubt it...Did you do something about their incopetance? Doubt, no it is easier to put the whole blame on BUSH....Bottomline, if you blame the President you also better blame you congressman and vote to change that as well....I realize S.Carolina is currently hold two republican seats...but not sure if they held those in 2002
1. ok, despite what France, Germany, and even Russia may have said. no matter what their intelligence said, what did they say about us going to war against Iraq? they were all against it, no? they said it would be better to first try diplomacy, no? in hindsight, were they wrong? Bush knew that France and Russia, having veto powers on the UN security council, would veto the US/UK proposal to go to war. so he withdrew the proposal and went about it on his own. now I'll be the first to agree that the UN is a pretty pathetic, over politicized organization. and since a huge chunk of money and resources that go into the UN are US money and resources, I also agree that those UN countries should have our backs. but there is nothing Saddam was doing directly to us that was such an affront that we should have started a war, basically on our own. yeah, the UK is powerful and they're our ally, but they've really only put in 15-20% of what's gone into this war. so really, it's us and future generations of Americans that are footing the bill. and for what? what is so great that has been accomplished? do you really honestly believe that Saddam was a major threat to us? if you do believe that, then we will just agree to disagree. he was a major offender of crimes against humanity (against his own people) and he was a threat to the oil companies, but I will never agree that he was a threat to us. and I still haven't seen you respond to my assertion (more than once) that the one great thing about Saddam was that he kept Iran in their place. do you agree or disagree with that? and do you agree or disagree that Iran is a much bigger threat than Iraq ever was?
2. as far as the 2 SC senators who sat on the floor in 2002, they've both since retired. they were (D) Fritz Hollings and (R) Strom Thurmond. Thurmond has since died. I NEVER voted for Fritz Hollings and I never would. I liked Strom (generally) but I stopped voting for him too because he was too old and senile. the 2 current SC senators are (R) Jim Demint and (R) Lindsey Graham. I voted for Demint and I would vote for him again in a minute. I also unfortunately voted for Graham (one of the co-authors of the amnesty bill) and would not vote for him again in a thousand years. Lindsey Graham is a disgrace to this state and country.
3. what do you mean "my" democrat??? what made you think I'm a democrat?? I'm a republican and have never voted for a democrat in a nation wide election. of course that will change due to the past 7 years. I voted for Bush not once, but TWICE. and I was duped (see, I can admit mistakes). I will never never ever vote for John McCain, and I'm fairly certain that Hillary is a socialist. if the election were tomorrow, I'd most likely vote for Giuliani because 1 he has the best chance of beating any opponent and 2 he's moderate.
but honestly, this whole 2 party system is completely broken and outdated. the dems and repubs have both sold us out long ago. big business and special interests rule this country, not us.
 
Top