Same Sex Marriage Okayed In New York ... Your Thoughts?

flower

Well-Known Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by reefraff http:///forum/thread/386373/same-sex-marriage-okayed-in-new-york-your-thoughts/60#post_3393389
It's a polite term used by a person raised in a day when such things weren't talked about. My mom referred to black folk as "colored" until the day she died. She was raised in the South in a day when that was the polite term. Few years before she died she had been at one of the box stores buying a TV. There was a question about the price and the cashier asked who had helped her and she told him "It was the tall colored guy". The cashier who was also black slips a note into her receipts "Black men don't like to be referred to as colored". The idiot was lucky I didn't still live out there or we may have done a dust dance in the parking lot. She gave the note to a manager who from the sound of it was freaked because he had no idea how to handle the situation. The guy did something obviously wrong but what kind of can of worms would he be opening if he rep remanded the guy. People try too hard to be offended.
My girlfriend got offended once when she heard my 4 year old daughter tell me that a black lady was at the door. I asked what she was offened at, because children have no way of explaining something except in the most simple way...a lady she didn't know was at the door and the most prominant feature was her skin to identify her. LOL..She had a much better experiance than another poor lady that had been standing nearby with a mastache...she was identified as such...That is what my son noticed, and I was so mortified....the more I tried to quiet him the louder he asked and eventually pointed and said...that lady right there..why does she have a mastache? He was 3, I'm sure she would rather have been called black.
I also must agree with Bionicarm...
If they want to practice catholism they can't engage in homosexual acts.......that is a basis of catholism. Just like I can't apply for the united negro college fund because I am white....is it truly any different? To ask an organization to confirm their belief. To suit everyone? You argue equal rights...but with organizations there are no equal rights. With religion you believe as the religion or you move on. Do you expect islam to accept jewish faith principles as well?

If you make a stand, you have to also understand that you will loose when it comes to religion, and private groups not run by the government such as the boy scouts. it is indeed a sin mentioned as something very immoral. You can't expect the church to rewrite doctorine.
I know a few gay people who really struggle with their deep seated beliefs and what they consider their way of being wired. They are absolutly tortured. It's a struggle I personally wouldn't be able to live with...I think I would choose religion and denounce my personal preference...but isn't that exactly why many young men became priests, and a few of them later after denying themselves for so long...do the unthinkable and much worse? Such an internal battle twists the mind of some and it's a scary thought, and I think a very bad reason to become a priest to try living by denying sex altogether.....religion can really mess with your mind, and two polar opposites in one person....I don't envy them.
However....human nature being ever resourceful ...new homosexual churches are popping up, they can get together and worship God and ignor the part of the Bible they don't like or misunderstand...Just like thousands of others with other hangups that prevent peace of mind...They don't have a church that agrees with them so they start a new one. Because in the end people really need to feel accepted and loved by God..it's some hunger in the soul, and those churches will most certainly marry those who get the license to be allowed to marry according to the laws of their state.
Marriage is a civil thing, you don't need a church to get married, it isn't a religious act, atheists get married all the time. To denouce there is a God is the ultimate evil. Yet they are kind to their fellow man, educated and a part of society. They don't attend church and could care less how much the church rages against them. Yet nobody pickets their grave site and declares their end while their families weap. Nobody walks around shaking in their boots fearing they will contaminate thier children with their teachings, which by the way could be done, they are a true threat to the religious right. A marriage license is how the government regulates people, putting them in groups to be managed which helps to keeps records for taxes and such. Church and state are forever separated and for good reason.
There is no slippery slope to slide by allowing same sex couples.
 

darthtang aw

Active Member
Psssttt...flower, I said that, not bionic.
Scot, got a question for you. Why is marriage such an issue? Would it matter to you if it was the same defining act in the eyes of the law if it was called civil unions and churches did not have to perform the ceremony if they chose not to? Define marriage.
Last, define love.......
 

old hickory

Member
Don't think this statement didn't go unnoticed. You say you aren't shouting from every corner or shoving your homosexuality down the throats of others, but you're sporting a gay rainbow flag which effectively does both of these. You are obviously craving attention and defining yourself by your sexuality, as I am defining myself by the use of the Broncos avatar.
In this thread, I have no problem with you stating your opinions and I will state mine. However, many members that aren't interested in participating in this thread are forced to see your shouting-from-every-corner, shove-my-homosexuality-down-your-throat avatar, despite you claiming not to be one of those types...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott T http:///forum/thread/386373/same-sex-marriage-okayed-in-new-york-your-thoughts/20#post_3393201
I do not go out on Marches, I do not shout from every corner, I do not shove my homosexuality down others throats,
 

meowzer

Moderator
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Hickory http:///forum/thread/386373/same-sex-marriage-okayed-in-new-york-your-thoughts/80#post_3393455
Don't think this statement didn't go unnoticed. You say you aren't shouting from every corner or shoving your homosexuality down the throats of others, but you're sporting a gay rainbow flag which effectively does both of these. You are obviously craving attention and defining yourself by your sexuality, as I am defining myself by the use of the Broncos avatar.
In this thread, I have no problem with you stating your opinions and I will state mine. However, many members that aren't interested in participating in this thread are forced to see your shouting-from-every-corner, shove-my-homosexuality-down-your-throat avatar, despite you claiming not to be one of those types...
WOW...I had no idea that is what the avatar meant...I COULD NOT CARE EITHER.....mine is a cat....so does this mean if you don;t like cats I am shoving the fact that I LOVE CATS down your throat...I think the Broncos suck....so should I take offense of your avatar.......
welcome to AMERICA....the land of free speech....and the freedom to POST any avatar that you would like (as long as it isn't porn)
p.s....I am still staying out of this...BUT that kinda annoyed me
 

old hickory

Member
Apparently you're having trouble following this. He said, he wasn't, to paraphrase, an in-your-face homosexual. He clearly is, evidenced by his avatar. It is the defining characteristic of his that he wants to share with strangers. While we chose trivial avatars that are not offensive and impersonal, he intentionally chose an avatar that is inflammatory to great portion of the American population and very personal. He clearly is an in-your-face homosexual and I was simply pointing that fact out.
Quote:
Originally Posted by meowzer http:///forum/thread/386373/same-sex-marriage-okayed-in-new-york-your-thoughts/80#post_3393459
WOW...I had no idea that is what the avatar meant...I COULD NOT CARE EITHER.....mine is a cat....so does this mean if you don;t like cats I am shoving the fact that I LOVE CATS down your throat...I think the Broncos suck....so should I take offense of your avatar.......
welcome to AMERICA....the land of free speech....and the freedom to POST any avatar that you would like (as long as it isn't porn)
p.s....I am still staying out of this...BUT that kinda annoyed me
 

reefraff

Active Member
To be fair Scott only put up that avitar after posting in this thread. I saw it more as letting folks where he was coming from than getting in anyone's face.
 

wangotango

Active Member
Legally a "marriage" is a piece of paper, not a ceremony in a church. If a church refuses to perform a wedding for a same-sex couple then they are within their right to do so. Nowhere have I seen a part of this bill being talked about making it mandatory for churches to perform same-sex marriage ceremonies. All they want is to have the same legal definition as a heterosexual couple. Making gay marriage legal does not mean you are forced to accept it. Personally the argument that "now my kids will be forced to be ok with it" is bull. If you don't support it, don't . It wasn't that long ago when I was in grade school, and from what I remember they taught us to be nice to everyone. If you chose not to like Billy because he was different or mean or wore stupid clothes then that was your choice. The teacher didn't "make" you like Billy.
 

wangotango

Active Member
Having a tiny rainbow flag in the corner of your post is not "in your face." Had there been imbedded images of rainbow flags, pictures of same-sex couples making out, videos of gay-rights protests, and "I'm gay and it's awesome, I don't care what you think" in every one of his posts then I would agree.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Hickory http:///forum/thread/386373/same-sex-marriage-okayed-in-new-york-your-thoughts/80#post_3393460
Apparently you're having trouble following this. He said, he wasn't, to paraphrase, an in-your-face homosexual. He clearly is, evidenced by his avatar. It is the defining characteristic of his that he wants to share with strangers. While we chose trivial avatars that are not offensive and impersonal, he intentionally chose an avatar that is inflammatory to great portion of the American population and very personal. He clearly is an in-your-face homosexual and I was simply pointing that fact out.
 

reefraff

Active Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by WangoTango http:///forum/thread/386373/same-sex-marriage-okayed-in-new-york-your-thoughts/80#post_3393463
Legally a "marriage" is a piece of paper, not a ceremony in a church. If a church refuses to perform a wedding for a same-sex couple then they are within their right to do so. Nowhere have I seen a part of this bill being talked about making it mandatory for churches to perform same-sex marriage ceremonies. All they want is to have the same legal definition as a heterosexual couple. Making gay marriage legal does not mean you are forced to accept it. Personally the argument that "now my kids will be forced to be ok with it" is bull. If you don't support it, don't . It wasn't that long ago when I was in grade school, and from what I remember they taught us to be nice to everyone. If you chose not to like Billy because he was different or mean or wore stupid clothes then that was your choice. The teacher didn't "make" you like Billy.
If that is the case why are people prosecuted for polygamy?
 

scott t

Active Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Hickory http:///forum/thread/386373/same-sex-marriage-okayed-in-new-york-your-thoughts/80#post_3393460
Apparently you're having trouble following this. He said, he wasn't, to paraphrase, an in-your-face homosexual. He clearly is, evidenced by his avatar. It is the defining characteristic of his that he wants to share with strangers. While we chose trivial avatars that are not offensive and impersonal, he intentionally chose an avatar that is inflammatory to great portion of the American population and very personal. He clearly is an in-your-face homosexual and I was simply pointing that fact out.
Hmm its a flag?? I do not see a flag pole. I see Rainbow colors, I see Red, Orange, Yellow, Green, Blue, Green, and Purple so just because its the colors of a Rainbow I must be shoving My Homosexuality Down your Throat? So, If I like the Rainbow Colors then it must be that I am Homosexual. That is a very interesting Concept I must say, So anyone who chooses to like a Rainbow or therefor Rainbow Colors Must be a Homosexual? That is a broad statement that you sir have made there, and a very stereo Typical one at that. So then let me see, I must not wear anything that is the color of the Rainbow then because someway it is shoving a Sexuality down someones throat. Then hmmm maybe we should take and Ban anything that has the likeness of Rainbow colors because it is inflammatory. I can tell you this also My sexuality does not define me, the contents of my character is what defines me as a person. I am first a person, and secondly a Homosexual. As, a Heterosexual is first a person and secondly a Heterosexual.
 

wangotango

Active Member
Because it is illegal. As far as I knew, same-sex marriage was not illegal, it just plain wasn't recognized as anything. Had it been illegal prior to this bill then I think this debate would be different. Should polygamy be re-legalized on just pure matters of law? Or on moral issues; is it more/as/less destructive as same-sex marriage or even heterosexual marriage? Is it destructive period?
Quote:
Originally Posted by reefraff http:///forum/thread/386373/same-sex-marriage-okayed-in-new-york-your-thoughts/80#post_3393465
If that is the case why are people prosecuted for polygamy?
 

bionicarm

Active Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Hickory http:///forum/thread/386373/same-sex-marriage-okayed-in-new-york-your-thoughts/80#post_3393460
Apparently you're having trouble following this. He said, he wasn't, to paraphrase, an in-your-face homosexual. He clearly is, evidenced by his avatar. It is the defining characteristic of his that he wants to share with strangers. While we chose trivial avatars that are not offensive and impersonal, he intentionally chose an avatar that is inflammatory to great portion of the American population and very personal. He clearly is an in-your-face homosexual and I was simply pointing that fact out.
You know you're a redneck....
Did you also bother to look at the "Joined Dates" on everyone's posts? Scott has been around here for quite some time. A lot longer than you have. Until this thread started, I personally had no clue Scott was gay, no would I care if he announced it to the entire world, much less on some fish forum that is perused by maybe a couple hundred people. It is quite apparent your stand on this issue. I hope the day never comes when you're considered the 'minority', and people look at you in a different way. Maybe if it does, then you'll know what it feels like.
 

old hickory

Member
For those of us participating in this discussion, we are well aware of his stance on homosexuality so there was no need to let us know where he's coming from. For those that see his posts elsewhere on this forum, it is certainly an in-your-face statement.
Quote:
Originally Posted by reefraff http:///forum/thread/386373/same-sex-marriage-okayed-in-new-york-your-thoughts/80#post_3393462
To be fair Scott only put up that avitar after posting in this thread. I saw it more as letting folks where he was coming from than getting in anyone's face.
 

old hickory

Member
I'm hardly a "redneck." Actually, I work in a corporate office, living the American dream as a Financial Analyst--hardly a 'redneck' occupation. The mere fact that I oppose homosexuality doesn't makes me a 'redneck.' It just makes me a person concerned about morality. You ought to hear my opinions on religion or stupidity or the American education system, or American ineptitude, or a number of other topics that are not part of this discussion. You will discover I am simply an opinionated person that doesn't necessarily flow with the stream of popular opinion.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bionicarm http:///forum/thread/386373/same-sex-marriage-okayed-in-new-york-your-thoughts/80#post_3393470
You know you're a redneck....
Did you also bother to look at the "Joined Dates" on everyone's posts? Scott has been around here for quite some time. A lot longer than you have. Until this thread started, I personally had no clue Scott was gay, no would I care if he announced it to the entire world, much less on some fish forum that is perused by maybe a couple hundred people. It is quite apparent your stand on this issue. I hope the day never comes when you're considered the 'minority', and people look at you in a different way. Maybe if it does, then you'll know what it feels like.
 

kiefers

Active Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott T http:///forum/thread/386373/same-sex-marriage-okayed-in-new-york-your-thoughts/60#post_3393423
Lol, They would Prob. Go broke Meowzer.. LOL hahhahahahahhahahahahaah

no... they would focus on something else rediculous. I understand your views and concerns regarding this issue Scott. Do I believe there should be gay marriage? Why not. Where is the harm in love, as for the topic of God..... god is all about love, love this love that....DO NOT JUDGE!! however, unfortunently opinions are like butt holes every one has one and some, some, want to push their beliefs, opinions, and of coarse take topics like this in other directions. Like Darth tang stated, it's about the laws and the laws are made by the law makers, gay or not. I work in the medical field and knew of a nurse that is gay. He was great to work with and was very trustworthy and lives his life just as "normal" as every body else. I mean come on people... Define NORMAL today this isn't Mayberry.So when I say it's of no concern of mine or I mean it. (unable to multi quote, sorry)
 

scott t

Active Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kiefers http:///forum/thread/386373/same-sex-marriage-okayed-in-new-york-your-thoughts/80#post_3393474
no... they would focus on something else rediculous. I understand your views and concerns regarding this issue Scott. Do I believe there should be gay marriage? Why not. Where is the harm in love, as for the topic of God..... god is all about love, love this love that....DO NOT JUDGE!! however, unfortunently opinions are like butt holes every one has one and some, some, want to push their beliefs, opinions, and of coarse take topics like this in other directions. Like Darth tang stated, it's about the laws and the laws are made by the law makers, gay or not. I work in the medical field and knew of a nurse that is gay. He was great to work with and was very trustworthy and lives his life just as "normal" as every body else. I mean come on people... Define NORMAL today this isn't Mayberry.So when I say it's of no concern of mine or I mean it. (unable to multi quote, sorry)
Yes, that is quite true that everyone has a right to their opinion, is their opinion wrong? No, not by any means is what they feel or what they believe is wrong, that is what is so great we are entitled to that. Am I going to be disrespectful to them for their opinion, No. Am I going to belittle them for their opinion, No. Am i going to call them names because of their opinion, No. I have been very respectful to other in this discussion, and will continue to be, because they have a right to state their Opinion, they have a right to voice their Opinion. Who am I to say what they can and can not believe, just one mere person out of billions in this world....
 
S

smartorl

Guest
It's not funny, but I'm a sicko and tend to find funny things in many things that are, well, eff'ed up.
Posting a rainbow flag means he is screaming for attention? Well, the I have been accused of the same because I a heavily tattooed female. The thing is, I had a choice and could give two craps who looks, cares, or is offended by my appearance.
Homosexuality disgusts you because it degrades morality? Narrow minded bigots are more likely to cause moralistic decline. The irony of people who openly denouce others rather than simply minding their own business never ceases to amaze me. History has shown us the error of these ways in the form of repression of women, the holocaust, the removal and eradication of Native Americans, and the equal rights of blacks.
Let us not forget the KKK members that sat in church feeling holier than thou only to burn crosses, commit murder and promote the suffering of innocent people because they had the misfortune of being born black and in their community. Let us not forget the children that died in the Holocaust. Let us not forget that hate that was acceptible at the time, that later is tinged with so much pain and regret.
The very fact that Scott has been a member all these year and the issue of his homosexuality only came out here, under these circumstances shows you quite clearly that he is not cramming anything down anyone's throats. It also points out that people may actually know alot more homosexual or bisexual people than they are aware of because it's easier to keep it private or hidden rather than face criticism and persecution.
For those on their soap boxes preaching about moral fiber....I assume the following:
You have never lied
You have never cheated on a spouse or girlfriend
You have never stretched the truth on your taxes
You have stayed married to the same person you lost your virginity to after you were married (of course)
well, you get the idea. No one is perfect and no one is without moral transgretions. However, whether or not homosexuality is actually a transgretion is a matter of opinion. By all means you are entitled to have an opinion.
Spewing the hate however takes us back to many similar, ugly times.
I can say one thing. I am hopeful that should you have children or if you have children, for their sake none of them turn out to be homosexual. It is people who go out of their way to promote hateful feelings who's children suffer the most.
 
Top